Cited by 185Disaster Response and ManagementPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Management and Resilience

Innovations in disaster mental health: Psychological first aid.

Vernberg, Eric M., Steinberg, Alan M., Jacobs, Anne K., Brymer, Melissa J., Watson, Patricia J., Osofsky, Joy D., Layne, Christopher M., Pynoos, Robert S. +1 more·2008·Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

Professional psychologists are called upon to deal with a broad array of crises and traumatic events. However, training and expertise in crisis response varies widely among practitioners, and there has been considerable controversy about the value of widely disseminated mental health crisis intervention protocols that include “debriefing” as an essential feature. This article gives an overview of the developmental process, guiding principles, and core actions of the Psychological First Aid Field Operations Guide (PFA Guide), which provides guidance for practitioners in responding to immediate mental health needs of children, adults, and families who have recently experienced a disaster or terrorist event. Issues in training, provider self-care, and evaluation research are also presented. The PFA Guide presents approaches thought to be most consistently supported by current research and practice so that they can be taught, used, and evaluated in field settings. Although we expect further refinement as more systematic research becomes available, the PFA Guide represents a sustained collaborative effort to define current evidence-informed best practices that can be utilized now by practitioners involved in disaster mental health responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012663

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernberg, E. M., Steinberg, A. M., Jacobs, A. K., Brymer, M. J., Watson, P. J., Osofsky, J. D., Layne, C. M., Pynoos, R. S., & Ruzek, J. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2008-08
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
381-388
ISSN
  • 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1323
OpenAlex
W2047728626
Cited by
185
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Child Traumatic Stress Network
  • National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
psychological first aid, disaster mental health, crisis intervention, debriefing, post-traumatic stress, terrorist attacks, evidence-based practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review