The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What’s inside the minds of securely and insecurely attached people? The secure-base script and its associations with attachment-style dimensions.
Abstract
In 8 studies the authors explored the procedural knowledge (secure-base script; H. S. Waters & E. Waters, 2006) associated with secure attachment (i.e., low scores on attachment anxiety and avoidance). The studies assessed the accessibility, richness, and automaticity of the secure-base script and the extent to which it guided the processing of attachment-relevant information. Secure attachment (lower scores on anxiety and avoidance) was associated with greater secure-base "scriptedness" of attachment narratives, greater accessibility of the secure-base script in narratives and dreams about distressing experiences, deeper processing of script-relevant information, and faster and more confident script-relevant judgments. In addition, secure participants' tendency to process secure-base information more deeply was evident even 5 days after being exposed to it and was impervious to the depletion of cognitive resources, indicating automatic processing. The discussion focuses on implications of the findings for understanding the cognitive bases of secure people's affect-regulation strategies and behavior in social relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.387 · Cited by 2,243
Paradoxical effects of thought suppression.
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.5 · Cited by 2,127
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601
Self-citationMikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(03)01002-5 · Cited by 1,485
Self-citationVohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.632 · Cited by 859
Attachment, Caregiving, and Altruism: Boosting Attachment Security Increases Compassion and Helping.
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Gillath, O., & Nitzberg, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.817 · Cited by 739
Self-citationAcquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge
Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90146-4 · Cited by 635
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003 · Cited by 501
Self-citation
Cited by
Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0022898 · Cited by 1,198
Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: Theory and evidence.
Dykas, M. J., & Cassidy, J. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021367 · Cited by 687
Attachment and emotion regulation in substance addictions and behavioral addictions
Estévez, A., Jáuregui, P., Sánchez-Marcos, I., López-González, H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.086 · Cited by 371
The Social Modulation of Pain: Others as Predictive Signals of Salience – a Systematic Review
Krahé, C., Springer, A., Weinman, J. A., & Fotopoulou, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00386 · Cited by 245
An Attachment Perspective on Traumatic and Posttraumatic Reactions
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Solomon, Z. (2015) · Future Directions in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7522-5_4 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Sapir-Lavid, Y., & Avihou-Kanza, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 615-633
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2007426292
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What’s inside the minds of securely and insecurely attached people? The secure-base script and its associations with attachment-style dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0015649
- The paper
- Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Sapir-Lavid, Y., & Avihou-Kanza, N. (2009). What’s inside the minds of securely and insecurely attached people? The secure-base script and its associations with attachment-style dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
