Cited by 508Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality

Noftle, Erik E., Shaver, Phillip R.·2006·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Noftle, Erik E.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
179-208
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166742466
Cited by
501
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fetzer Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
adult attachment styles, Big Five personality traits, relationship quality, attachment dimensions, NEO-PI-R, Big Five Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review