Cited by 52Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Cue-specific reactivity in experienced gamblers.

Open access
Wulfert, Edelgard, Maxson, Julie, Jardin, Bianca·2009·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

To examine whether gambling cue reactivity is cue-specific, 47 scratch-off lottery players and 47 horse race gamblers were presented with video clips of their preferred and nonpreferred modes of gambling, and two control stimuli including an exciting car race and a mental stressor task while heart rates, excitement, and urge to gamble were being measured. Heart rates for both groups of gamblers were highest to the mental stressor and did not differ in response to the other three cues. Excitement for both groups was highest in response to the action cues (horse race and car chase). Urge to gamble was significantly higher for each group to their preferred mode of gambling. A post hoc exploratory analysis comparing social gamblers (n = 54) and probable pathological gamblers (n = 40) revealed a similar pattern of responses. However, pathological gamblers reported overall significantly higher urges to gamble than social gamblers. As urges have been shown to play a pivotal role in addictive behaviors and relapse, the current findings may have implications for the development of gambling problems and relapse after successful treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017134

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Opinion Research Center 1999 Gambling impact and behavior study: Final report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission Chicago University of Chicago Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wulfert, E., Maxson, J., & Jardin, B.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2009-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
731-735
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W2139825174
Cited by
52
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH064568)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
cue specificity, gambling urges, heart rate, excitement, social gambling, gambling addiction, relapse
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cues, Female, Gambling, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review