Cited by 51Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesGambling Behavior and TreatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Cue-induced Craving in Pathological Buying: Empirical Evidence and Clinical Implications

Trotzke, Patrick, Starcke, Katrin, Pedersen, Anya, Brand, Matthias·2014·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pathological buying is associated with marked distress and impaired functioning in important life domains. It is currently under debate whether pathological buying can be considered a behavioral addiction. In analogy to results reported in addicted individuals, craving reactions elicited by addiction-related cues might be an underlying mechanism for the etiology and pathogenesis of pathological buying. METHODS: In the present study, 30 pathological buyers and 30 matched control participants were examined with a cue-reactivity paradigm consisting of shopping and control cues. Skin conductance responses, as well as subjective ratings for arousal, valence, and urge to buy, were assessed. Subjective craving reactions were measured before and after the cue-reactivity paradigm. RESULTS: On a physiological level, skin conductance responses toward shopping cues were higher in pathological buyers (mean [M; standard deviation {SD}] = 0.26 [0.13]) compared with control participants (M [SD] = 0.19 [0.09]; t(58) = 2.29, p = .025, d = 0.60). On a behavioral level, the individuals with pathological buying rated the shopping cues as more arousing and more positive, and reported a greater urge to buy compared with control participants and with control cues. An increase in subjective craving after completing the cue-reactivity paradigm was observed only in the pathological buyers (Mpre [SD] = 1.95 [1.47], Mpost [SD] = 2.87 [1.79]; t(29) = 5.07, p < .001, d = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Cue-reactivity and craving might be potential correlates for the development and maintenance of pathological buying. The results demonstrate similarities between pathological buying and substance or behavioral addictions and provide implications for clinical treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0000000000000126

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trotzke, P., Starcke, K., Pedersen, A., & Brand, M.
Affiliations
Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DE)
Corresponding author
Brand, Matthias
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2014-11
Volume
76
Issue
9
Pages
694-700
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061537406
Cited by
51
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
15.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
compulsive buying, craving, cue reactivity, skin conductance response, urge to buy, behavioral addiction, arousal, valence
MeSH terms
Adult, Consumer Behavior, Cues, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Behavior, Addictive, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review