Cited by 14Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSmoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

The influence of acutely administered nicotine on cue-induced craving for gambling in at-risk video lottery terminal gamblers who smoke

McGrath, Daniel S., Dorbeck, Anders, Barrett, Sean P.·2013·Behavioural Pharmacology

Abstract

Evidence indicates that tobacco use and gambling often co-occur. Despite this association, little is known about how tobacco use affects the propensity to gamble. Nicotine, the putative addictive component of tobacco, has been reported to potentiate the hedonic value of other nonsmoking stimuli. Environmental cues have been identified as an important contributor to relapse in addictive behavior; however, the extent to which nicotine can affect the strength of gambling cues remains unknown. This study examined whether nicotine influences subjective ratings for gambling following gambling cues. In a mixed within/between-subjects design, 30 (20 men) video lottery terminal (VLT) gamblers ('moderate-risk' or 'problem' gamblers) who smoke daily were assigned to nicotine (4 mg deliverable) or placebo lozenge conditions. Subjective and behavioral responses were assessed at baseline, following lozenge, following neutral cues, and following presentation of gambling cues. Nicotine lozenge was found to significantly reduce tobacco-related cravings (P<0.05) but did not affect gambling-related cravings, the choice to play a VLT, or other subjective responses. These results suggest that a low dose of acutely administered nicotine does not increase cue-induced craving for gambling in at-risk VLT gamblers who smoke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/fbp.0b013e32835f3cff

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGrath, D. S., Dorbeck, A., & Barrett, S. P.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Sean P.
Venue
Behavioural Pharmacology
Published
2013-04
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
124-132
ISSN
0955-8810 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334132018
Cited by
14
References
43
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  • Dalhousie University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
nicotine, gambling cues, cue-induced craving, video lottery terminals, problem gambling, tobacco use, co-occurring addiction, nicotine lozenges, gambling behavior
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Cues, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Nicotine, Nova Scotia, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reinforcement, Psychology, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Tobacco Use Cessation, Young Adult, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review