Cited by 166Identity, Memory, and TherapyMemory Processes and InfluencesChild and Animal Learning Development

On telling the whole story: Facts and interpretations in autobiographical memory narratives from childhood through midadolescence.

Pasupathi, Monisha, Wainryb, Cecilia·2010·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This article examines age differences from childhood through middle adolescence in the extent to which children include factual and interpretive information in constructing autobiographical memory narratives. Factual information is defined as observable or perceptible information available to all individuals who experience a given event, while interpretive information is defined as information that articulates the desires, emotions, beliefs, and thoughts of the participant and other individuals who experience an event. Developmental research suggests that the latter type of information should become particularly prevalent in later adolescence, while the former should be abundantly evident by age 8. Across 2 studies, we found evidence for strong increases in interpretive information during adolescence, but not before. These increases were evident across different types of events, and across different subtypes of interpretive content. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the development of autobiographical memory in childhood and adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018897

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processes of autobiographical remembering and meaning-making are often associated with social interactions.

    “processes of autobiographical remembering and meaning-making are often associated with social interactions (Grysman et al., 2024;Nelson & Fivush, 2004;Pasupathi & Wainryb, 2010)”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Pasupathi & Wainryb, 2010

  • Processes of narrating one's life and reasoning about autobiographical events are deeply social in nature and often take place in conversations.

    “the processes of narrating one's life and reasoning about autobiographical events are deeply social in nature and often take place in conversations (Grysman et al., 2024;Nelson & Fivush, 2004;Pasupathi & Wainryb, 2010).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Pasupathi & Wainryb, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasupathi, M., & Wainryb, C.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
735-746
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2163836323
Cited by
166
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
15.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autobiographical memory, memory narratives, factual information, age differences, childhood, adolescence, memory development, narrative content
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Concept Formation, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Self Concept, Self Disclosure, Suggestion, Narration, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review