The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation
Open accessAbstract
La presente revisión tiene como objetivo hacer una recopilación teórica sobre algunos de los aspectos que se encuentran relacionados con el bullying, comenzando por enunciar elementos fundamentales de la problemática. Posteriormente se exponen las características de las víctimas, victimarios y espectadores con los aspectos más relevantes de cada cual y las relaciones existentes entre sí. Se reconoce la preeminencia tanto internacional como nacional que supone y explica a su vez una novedosa forma de matoneo en el cyberbullying y la importancia que conlleva. Nota: Para consultar la carta de autorización de publicación de este documento por favor copie y pegue el siguiente enlace en su navegador de internet: http://hdl.handle.net/10818/11373
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For this reason, having problematic relationships with peers (i.e., being isolated, having no friends, not being liked by peers, etc.) is a strong risk factor for cybervictimization [52,53].”
From Cybervictimization and Online Sexual Harassment: Prevalence, Association, and Predictors (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Peer victimisation affects 10%–35% of adolescents and is both a precursor and an outcome of emotional symptoms (Cook, Williams, Guerra, Kim, & Sadek, 2010; Modecki, Minchin, Harbaugh, Guerra, & Runions, 2014; Moore et al., 2017; Reijntjes, Kamphuis, Prinzie, & Telch, 2010).”
From A cross‐lagged twin study of emotional symptoms, social isolation and peer victimisation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood (2023) · cites this paper as Cook, Williams, Guerra, Kim, & Sadek, 2010
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74 · Cited by 5,510
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 · Cited by 4,829
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Bullying Behaviors Among US Youth
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons‐Morton, B. G., & Scheidt, P. C. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.16.2094 · Cited by 3,805
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bullying Prevalence Across Contexts: A Meta-analysis Measuring Cyber and Traditional Bullying
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007 · Cited by 1,659
Self-citationSchool Bullying: Development and Some Important Challenges
Olweus, D. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516 · Cited by 1,406
Psychological, Physical, and Academic Correlates of Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018 · Cited by 1,295
Domitrovich, C. E., Durlak, J. A., Staley, K. C., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12739 · Cited by 880
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions
Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2017) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740 · Cited by 1,080
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- School Psychology Quarterly
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 65-83
- ISSN
- 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1560
- OpenAlex
- W2118363235
- Semantic Scholar
- 6296094175e39f3a087fa28df2d008bde5dfecc1
- Cited by
- 1,758
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 182 · 2020: 199 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 114 · 2015: 133 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 71.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- School Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- bullying, bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, bullying bystanders, cyberbullying, predictors of bullying, childhood, adolescence, victim characteristics, offender characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
