Cited by 1,295Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsWorkplace Violence and Bullying

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological, Physical, and Academic Correlates of Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying

Open access
Kowalski, Robin M., Limber, Susan P.·2013·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between children's and adolescents' experiences with cyberbullying and traditional bullying and psychological health, physical health, and academic performance. METHODS: Nine hundred thirty-one students in grades 6 through 12 completed an anonymous survey examining their experiences with cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Also included were measures of anxiety, depression, self-esteem, physical well-being, school attendance, and academic performance. RESULTS: Participants were categorized as belonging to one of four groups: cyber victims, cyberbullies, cyber bully/victims, and those not involved in cyberbullying. A similar categorization was done with traditional bullying. Those in the bully/victim groups (and particularly the cyber bully/victim group) had the most negative scores on most measures of psychological health, physical, health, and academic performance. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a substantial, although not perfect, overlap between involvement in traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Additionally, the physical, psychological, and academic correlates of the two types of bullying resembled one another.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,295

Metadata

Authors
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P.
Affiliations
Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Kowalski, Robin M.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
S13-S20
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125460309
Cited by
1,295
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 141 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 3
FWCI
100.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
cyberbullying, traditional bullying, bullying victims, bully-victims, cyberbullying perpetrators, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, physical health, school attendance, academic performance, adolescents, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Data Collection, Depression, Educational Status, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Pennsylvania, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Internet, Young Adult, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review