Cited by 116Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

How does tele-mental health affect group therapy process? Secondary analysis of a noninferiority trial.

Greene, Carolyn J., Morland, Leslie A., Macdonald, Alexandra, Frueh, B. Christopher, Grubbs, Kathleen M., Rosen, Craig S.·2010·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Video teleconferencing (VTC) is used for mental health treatment delivery to geographically remote, underserved populations. However, few studies have examined how VTC affects individual or group psychotherapy processes. This study compares process variables such as therapeutic alliance and attrition among participants receiving anger management group therapy either through traditional face-to-face delivery or by VTC. METHOD: The current study represents secondary analyses of a randomized noninferiority trial (Morland et al., in press) in which clinical effectiveness of VTC delivery proved noninferior to in-person delivery. Participants were male veterans (N = 112) with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and moderate to severe anger problems. The present study examined potential differences in process variables, including therapeutic alliance, satisfaction, treatment credibility, attendance, homework completion, and attrition. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two modalities on most process variables. However, individuals in the VTC condition exhibited lower alliance with the group leader than those in the in-person condition. Mean self-leader alliance scores were 4.2 (SD = 0.8) and 4.5 (SD = 0.4), respectively, where 5 represents strongly agree and 4 represents agree with positive statements about the relationship, suggesting that participants in both conditions felt reasonably strong alliance in absolute terms. Individuals who had stronger alliance tended to have better anger outcomes, yet the effect was not strong enough to result in the VTC condition producing inferior aggregate outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that even if group psychotherapy via VTC differs in subtle ways from in-person delivery, VTC is a viable and effective means of delivering psychotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0020158

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study used VCT to deliver group therapy to military veterans for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and anger management, and both treatment modalities (therapist via VCT vs in-person) were effective in reducing anger scores.

    “One study used VCT to deliver group therapy to military veterans for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and anger management. 5 In both conditions, group members attended the session together in-person. However, there were treatment arms with the therapist attending via VCT versus in-person. Both treatment modalities were effective in reducing anger scores.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, C. J., Morland, L. A., Macdonald, A., Frueh, B. C., Grubbs, K. M., & Rosen, C. S.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • VA Pacific Islands Health Care System (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Hawaii System (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
746-750
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2028357419
Cited by
116
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs (TEL 03-080-3)
  • VA Pacific Islands Healthcare System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
telemental health, videoconferencing, group therapy, anger management, therapeutic relationship, attrition, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, homework completion, treatment credibility, treatment satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anger, Combat Disorders, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Environment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Remote Consultation, Vietnam Conflict, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review