Cited by 62Psychology of Social InfluenceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

There’s Nothing Social about Social Priming: Derailing the “Train Wreck”

Open access
Sherman, Jeffrey W., Rivers, Andrew M.·2021·Psychological Inquiry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Failures to replicate high-profile priming effects have raised questions about the reliability of so-called “social priming” phenomena. However, not only are many of the relevant studies not particularly social in nature, but other robust priming effects that are clearly social in nature do not count as social priming. Most importantly, the focus on the supposedly social aspect of the work has obscured factors that help to account for the relative reliability of priming effects. Here, we examine the construct of social priming, describe some simple demonstrations on the role of experimental design in priming reproducibility, and discuss future avenues for building a better understanding of priming. We conclude that the term “social priming” should be laid to rest, and that it is time to move past arguments about the reliability of specific effects and shift our energy to building theories that help us better understand the mechanisms underlying priming effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1047840x.2021.1889312

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, J. W., & Rivers, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Sherman, Jeffrey W.
  • Rivers, Andrew M.
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2021-01-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W3142617309
Cited by
62
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social priming, replication failure, reproducibility, experimental design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review