Cited by 33Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Experiential avoidance as a mediator of the association between posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and social support: A longitudinal analysis

Open access
Kelly, Megan M., DeBeer, Bryann B., Meyer, Eric C., Kimbrel, Nathan A., Gulliver, Suzy B., Morissette, Sandra B.·2019·Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often experience difficulties with social reintegration after deployment. Experiential avoidance, the tendency to avoid unwanted thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations (including in response to interactions with others) may be a key factor that explains the association between PTSD symptoms and postdeployment social support. The present study evaluated whether experiential avoidance mediates the association between PTSD symptoms and perceptions of postdeployment social support. METHOD: Veterans (n = 145) who served in support of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan were enrolled in a study evaluating returning veterans' experiences. Participants were evaluated at an initial baseline assessment and 8-months later. Participants completed the lifetime Clinician Administered PTSD Scale and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II at baseline, as well as the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory-Post Deployment Social Support Questionnaire at the 8-month assessment. RESULTS: Baseline experiential avoidance mediated the association between lifetime PTSD symptoms and 8-month social support. CONCLUSIONS: Experiential avoidance may be an important target for treatment to improve long-term functional recovery and reintegration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0000375

Cites

45 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hayes AF (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, & Wilson KG (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  3. Sheehan DV, Janavs J, Baker R, Harnett-Sheehan K, Knapp E, Sheehan M, … Bonora LI (1998). MINI-Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-English Version 5.0. 0-DSM–IV. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 34– 40. 9881538

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, M. M., DeBeer, B. B., Meyer, E. C., Kimbrel, N. A., Gulliver, S. B., & Morissette, S. B.
Affiliations
  • VA New England Healthcare System (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Durham VA Medical Center (US)
  • Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
Published
2019-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
353-359
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2903999938
Cited by
33
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans
  • VISN 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center
  • Social and Community Reintegration Research Program
  • Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (I01RX000304-01, I01RX000304-04)
  • Clinical Sciences Research and Development Service (IK2 CX000525))
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Central Texas Veterans Health Care System
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
experiential avoidance, post-traumatic stress disorder, social support, veterans, mediation, Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, functional recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Avoidance Learning, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Resilience, Psychological, Afghan Campaign 2001-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review