Cited by 30Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

When feedback harms and collaboration helps in computer simulation environments: An expertise reversal effect.

Nihalani, Priya K., Mayrath, Michael, Robinson, Daniel H.·2011·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

We investigated the effects of feedback and collaboration on undergraduates' transfer performance when using a computer networing training simulation. In Experiment 1, 65 computer science novices worked through an instructional protocol individually (control), individually with feedback, or collaboratively with feedback. Unexpectedly, collaboration appeared to inhibit students' transfer performance relative to individual feedback. Experiment 2 was a replication with 62 computer science experts. This time, collaboration facilitated transfer performance. Both experiments revealed an interaction between instructional procedures producing an expertise reversal effect: Novices who worked individually with feedback actually outperformed their expert counterparts (Kalyuga, Ayres, Chandler, & Sweller, 2003). When students have low prior knowledge, presenting feedback as they work independently is more effective than collaborating with other novices. On the other hand, when students have high prior knowledge, individual feedback may actually inhibit learning and reverse the benefits of expertise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025276

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nihalani, P. K., Mayrath, M., & Robinson, D. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2011-11
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
776-785
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2029711610
Cited by
30
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
expertise reversal effect, feedback, collaboration, transfer of learning, computer simulation, prior knowledge, novice learners, expert learners, individual vs collaborative learning, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review