Cited by 64Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Shared cognitive processes underlying past and future thinking: The impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on event specificity.

Open access
Anderson, Rachel J., Dewhurst, Stephen A., Nash, Robert A.·2012·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Recent literature has argued that whereas remembering the past and imagining the future make use of shared cognitive substrates, simulating future events places heavier demands on executive resources. These propositions were explored in 3 experiments comparing the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on speed and accuracy of past event retrieval and future event simulation. Results provide support for the suggestion that both past and future episodes can be constructed through 2 mechanisms: a noneffortful "direct" pathway and a controlled, effortful "generative" pathway. However, limited evidence emerged for the suggestion that simulating of future, compared with retrieving past, episodes places heavier demands on executive resources; only under certain conditions did it emerge as a more error prone and lengthier process. The findings are discussed in terms of how retrieval and simulation make use of the same cognitive substrates in subtly different ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025451

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Associative strength can explain why past events are constructed more fluently and quickly than imagined events, because remembered events have higher associative strength.

    “associative strength can explain findings that past events are constructed more fluently and quickly than imagined events (Anderson, Dewhurst, & Nash, 2012;Wiebels et al., 2019), given that associative strength is higher for remembered events.”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Anderson, Dewhurst, & Nash, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, R. J., Dewhurst, S. A., & Nash, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2012
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
356-365
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2038365908
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-22-3624)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
mental imagery, executive function, episodic memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Cues, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Semantics, Students, Thinking, Universities, Vocabulary, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review