Cited by 296Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment security: A meta-analysis of three decades of research

Lucassen, Nicole, Tharner, Anne, Van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Volling, Brenda L., Verhulst, Frank C., Lambregtse-Van den Berg, Mijke P., Tiemeier, Henning·2011·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

For almost three decades, the association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment security has been studied. The first wave of studies on the correlates of infant-father attachment showed a weak association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment security (r = .13, p < .001, k = 8, N = 546). In the current paper, a meta-analysis of the association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment based on all studies currently available is presented, and the change over time of the association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment is investigated. Studies using an observational measure of paternal interactive behavior with the infant, and the Strange Situation Procedure to observe the attachment relationship were included. Paternal sensitivity is differentiated from paternal sensitivity combined with stimulation in the interaction with the infant. Higher levels of paternal sensitivity were associated with more infant-father attachment security (r = .12, p < .001, k = 16, N = 1,355). Fathers' sensitive play combined with stimulation was not more strongly associated with attachment security than sensitive interactions without stimulation of play. Despite possible changes in paternal role patterns, we did not find stronger associations between paternal sensitivity and infant attachment in more recent years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025855

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For fathers, the meta-analytic association between sensitivity and secure attachment is weaker (r = .12).

    “For fathers, this meta‐analytic association is weaker (r = .12; Lucassen et al., 2011)”

    From Birth of a Father: Fathering in the First 1,000 Days (2019) · cites this paper as Lucassen et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucassen, N., Tharner, A., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Volling, B. L., Verhulst, F. C., Lambregtse-Van den Berg, M. P., & Tiemeier, H.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
986-992
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2153344339
Cited by
296
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
paternal sensitivity, attachment security, father-infant interaction, Strange Situation Procedure
MeSH terms
Adult, Father-Child Relations, Fathers, Humans, Infant, Male, Object Attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review