Cited by 85Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Maternal sensitivity to infants in various settings predicts harsh discipline in toddlerhood

Joosen, Katharina J., Mesman, Judi, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.·2012·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

In a longitudinal study with 73 mothers and their second-born child, stability and main-level differences between measures of maternal sensitivity across settings and over time were examined. Furthermore, the predictability of harsh discipline by these different maternal sensitivity measures was studied. Maternal sensitivity was assessed at three and six months during bathing, free play on mother's lap and the baseline and reunion episode of the Still Face Paradigm (SFP; Tronick, Als, Adamson, Wise, & Brazelton, 1978 Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S. and Brazelton, T. B. 1978. Infants response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17: 1–13. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Harsh discipline was observed during three home visits in the second year of life. Results showed a single underlying factor for all maternal sensitivity settings at both time points and significant stability over time. Harsh discipline was predicted by maternal sensitivity at three months, which was fully mediated by maternal sensitivity at six months. Early failure to respond appropriately to infant signals is an important indicator of risk for future harsh parenting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2012.661217

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joosen, K. J., Mesman, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Mesman, Judi
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2012-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
101-117
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2141328464
Cited by
85
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
maternal sensitivity, harsh discipline, toddlerhood, parental behavior, still-face paradigm, mother-infant interaction, second-born children, longitudinal stability, mediation
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Punishment, Socioeconomic Factors, Temperament, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review