Cited by 173Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Parental sensitivity and child behavioral problems: A meta-analytic review

Open access
Cooke, Jessica E, Deneault, Audrey-Ann, Devereux, Chloe, Eirich, Rachel, Fearon, R M Pasco, Madigan, Sheri·2022·Child Development

Abstract

Meta-analytic associations between observed parental sensitivity and child behavioral problems were examined (children aged 0–17 years). Studies (k = 108, N = 28,114) contained sociodemographically diverse samples, primarily from North America and Europe, reporting on parent-child dyads (95% mothers; 54% boys). Sensitivity significantly related to internalizing (k = 69 studies; N = 14,729; r = −.08, 95% CI [−.12, −.05]) and externalizing (k = 94; N = 25,418; r = −.14, 95% CI [−.17, −.11]) problems, with stronger associations found for externalizing. For internalizing problems, associations were significantly stronger among samples with low socioeconomic status (SES) versus mid-high SES, in peer-reviewed versus unpublished dissertations, and in studies using composite versus single scale sensitivity measures. No other moderators emerged as significant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.13764

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooke, J. E., Deneault, A.-A., Devereux, C., Eirich, R., Fearon, R. M. P., & Madigan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Cambridge , Cambridge ,
Corresponding author
Madigan, Sheri
Venue
Child Development
Published
2022-08-30
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
1231-1248
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W4221091075
Cited by
173
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs Program
  • Alberta Innovates
  • Vanier Canada
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
parental sensitivity, child behavior problems, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, socioeconomic status, parent-child dyads, mothers
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review