Cited by 35Health disparities and outcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The association between childhood emotional functioning and adulthood inflammation is modified by early-life socioeconomic status.

Open access
Appleton, Allison A., Buka, Stephen L., McCormick, Marie C., Koenen, Karestan C., Loucks, Eric B., Kubzansky, Laura D.·2012·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identifying interrelationships among childhood social disadvantage, emotional functioning and adult health may help illustrate how health disparities may become embedded early in life, yet few have considered how these factors are associated. We examined whether the association of child emotional functioning and adult health risk was modified by child socioeconomic status (CSES), or whether child emotional functioning mediated the association of CSES and adult health risk. METHOD: We studied 430 adult offspring (mean age 42 years) of Collaborative Perinatal Project participants, a cohort of pregnant women enrolled in 1959-1966 (Broman, Nichols, & Kennedy, 1975; Niswander & Gordon, 1972). Child emotional functioning was assessed by psychologist ratings at age 7 and included inappropriate self regulation (ISR) and distress proneness. CSES measures included parental education, household income, and parental occupation. Adult health risk was measured by the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP). Hypotheses were tested with multiple linear regression. Effect modification was evaluated via interaction terms and stratification of fully adjusted models by CSES. Mediation by child emotional functioning was evaluated via coefficient changes. RESULTS: There was no evidence that child emotional functioning mediated the association of CSES and CRP. Significant interactions were observed for ISR and low income (b = 1.67, SE = 0.70, p < .05), and distress proneness and low (b = 3.14, SE = 1.47, p < .05) and middle (b = 3.52, SE = 1.46, p < .05) income. Stratified models indicated that associations of child emotion with CRP varied significantly by level of parental education, household income and occupation. CONCLUSION: The highest levels of adult inflammation were observed among those with childhood emotional problems who were also exposed to low socioeconomic status as children. This study suggests adulthood disparities in CRP may have developmental origins in childhood adversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027300

Cites

29 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low socioeconomic status in childhood is related to higher levels of circulating IL-6 and CRP in adults.

    “Low socioeconomic status in childhood, in turn, has been related to higher levels of circulating IL-6 and CRP in adults”

    From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Appleton et al., 2012

    The Results (Evaluating Evidence for Effect Modification; page unavailable) report higher adult CRP among children with emotional-functioning problems who grew up in low-SES environments, compared with similarly functioning children from higher-SES environments. The claim omits that qualification, and the paper reports CRP rather than IL-6 as its adult inflammatory measure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appleton, A. A., Buka, S. L., McCormick, M. C., Koenen, K. C., Loucks, E. B., & Kubzansky, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
413-422
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2067215815
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (P50 CA084719)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institute of Aging (AG023397).)
  • Harvard School of Public Health (T32HL098048)
  • National Institutes of Mental Health (K08-MH070627; MH078928)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
socioeconomic status, childhood adversity, C-reactive protein, health disparities, mediation, effect modification, Collaborative Perinatal Project, parental income, parental education, parental occupation
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Child, Educational Status, Emotions, Family, Female, Humans, Income, Inflammation, New England, Occupations, Pregnancy, Risk, Social Class, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review