Cited by 191Cultural Differences and ValuesMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors.

Zhou, Ning, Lam, Shui-Fong, Chan, Kam Chi·2012·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Chinese classrooms present an intriguing paradox to the claim of self-determination theory that autonomy facilitates learning.Chinese teachers appear to be controlling but Chinese students do not have poor academic performance in international comparisons.The present study addressed this paradox by examining the cultural differences in students' interpretation of teacher controlling behaviors.Affective meanings of teacher controlling behaviors were solicited from 158 Chinese 5 th graders and 115 American 5 th graders.It was found that the same teacher controlling behaviors had different affective meanings for different cultural groups (Chinese vs. American) and groups with different levels of social-emotional relatedness with teachers (High vs. Low).Chinese children perceived the behaviors as less controlling than American children and in turn reported more motivated in their teachers' class than American children.Regardless of culture, children with high social-emotional relatedness with teachers perceived the behaviors as less controlling than children with low social-emotional relatedness with teachers.It was also found that internalization mediated the relation between social-emotional relatedness and children's learning motivation in both cultures.The findings revealed cultural differences as well as similarities in the psychological process of internalization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027609

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • American compared to Chinese elementary school children perceived a controlling teacher as more hurtful and controlling, which was reflected in their reduced motivation for schoolwork.

    “For instance, American compared to Chinese elementary school children perceived a controlling teacher as more hurtful and controlling, which was reflected in their reduced motivation for schoolwork (Zhou et al. 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, N., Lam, S.-F., & Chan, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Purdue University Northwest (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2012-11
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
1162-1174
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2071792475
Cited by
191
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-determination theory, student perceptions of teachers, affective meaning, student motivation, internalization, cross-cultural comparison, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review