The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disruptive innovations for designing and diffusing evidence-based interventions
Open accessAbstract
Evidence-based therapeutic and preventive intervention programs (EBIs) have been growing exponentially. Yet EBIs have not been broadly adopted in the United States. In order for our EBI science to significantly reduce disease burden, we need to critically reexamine our scientific conventions and norms. Innovation may be spurred by reexamining the traditional biomedical model for validating, implementing, and diffusing EBI products and science. The model of disruptive innovations suggests that we reengineer EBIs on the basis of their most robust features in order to serve more people in less time and at lower cost. A disruptive innovation provides a simpler and less expensive alternative that meets the essential needs for the majority of consumers and is more accessible, scalable, replicable, and sustainable. Examples of disruptive innovations from other fields include minute clinics embedded in retail chain drug stores, $2 generic eyeglasses, automated teller machines, and telemedicine. Four new research approaches will be required to support disruptive innovations in EBI science: synthesize common elements across EBIs; experiment with new delivery formats (e.g., consumer controlled, self-directed, brief, paraprofessional, coaching, and technology and media strategies); adopt market strategies to promote and diffuse EBI science, knowledge, and products; and adopt continuous quality improvement as a research paradigm for systematically improving EBIs, based on ongoing monitoring data and feedback. EBI science can have more impact if it can better leverage what we know from existing EBIs in order to inspire, engage, inform, and support families and children to adopt and sustain healthy daily routines and lifestyles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Modularity is also an ideal fit with current trends toward disruptive innovations in EBPIs, as it is patient-centered, responsive to idiographic variables that influence treatment engagement and response, and maintains a tight link to the evidence base while allowing therapists to select components that match their expertise and are feasible within their practice settings (Rotheram-Borus et al., 2”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as Rotheram-Borus et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This science-practice gap may reflect a failure of the dominant intervention research paradigm to adequately address factors that influence the implementation of EBPI in usual care (Fairburn & Wilson, 2013; Kazdin & Blase, 2011; Rotheram-Borus, Swendeman, & Chorpita, 2012).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as Rotheram-Borus, Swendeman, & Chorpita, 2012
In the citing paper
“Evidence-based practices not only require careful examination of the efficacy of an intervention but also the ability of the evidence-based practice to be translated and disseminated for real-world use [2].”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“It has been argued elsewhere that evidence-based practices often become their own separate silos of evidence, rendering it very difficult to mix and match modules across evidence-based practices [2].”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The disruptive innovation process emphasizes the focus on providing simpler and less expensive alternatives to current practices that meet the essential need for the majority of users in order to make them more easily accessible, scalable, and replicable [2].”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armstrong, J. S., & Georgoff, D. M. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90019-2 · Cited by 18,339
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults
Kleinstäuber, M., Witthöft, M., Steffanowski, A., van Marwijk, H., Hiller, W., & Lambert, M. J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010628.pub2 · Cited by 11,369
Motivational beliefs, values, and goals
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · Cited by 7,587
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.47 · Cited by 4,705
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Christensen, C. M. (2013) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 3,708
Wang, P. S., Lane, M., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Wells, K. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.629 · Cited by 2,695 · cited 1×
“Access to mental health care is highly limited; even though parity legislation exists, mental health and physical health disorders continue to be treated differentially (Wang et al., 2005).”
BackgroundThe experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-2254 · Cited by 2,693
Writing About Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x · Cited by 2,486
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9 · Cited by 2,169
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- California Healthcare Foundation 2006 The minute clinic movement: Model for the future or 60 seconds of fame? 7 18 http://www.chcf.org/press/view.cfm?itemID=123240
- Fishbein M Bandura A Triandis HC Factors influencing behavior and behavior change Final Report- NIMH Theorists Workshop Washington, DC National Institute of Mental Health 1991
- Pine JB Gilmore JH 1999 The Experience Economy Cambridge, MA Harvard Business School Press
- Sutherland A Thompson B 2001 Kidfluence: Why kids today mean business Toronto, Canada McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ehde, D. M., Dillworth, T. M., & Turner, J. A. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0035747 · Cited by 879
Kazdin, A. E. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004 · Cited by 554
Social and Emotional Learning in Schools: From Programs to Strategies and commentaries
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012) · Child Policy Nexus · doi:10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x · Cited by 601
Novel Models for Delivering Mental Health Services and Reducing the Burdens of Mental Illness
Kazdin, A. E., & Rabbitt, S. M. (2013) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702612463566 · Cited by 465
User‐centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation.
Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K. (2016) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12154 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Swendeman, D., & Chorpita, B. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 463-476
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- PMC
- PMC3951837
- OpenAlex
- W2161464172
- Semantic Scholar
- ca50e2e0f43c9261a4f32ef583a1989c7c90cc7e
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 51.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH058107)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- disruptive innovation, evidence-based interventions, diffusion of innovations, implementation science, biomedical model, intervention scalability, continuous quality improvement, market strategy, self-guided intervention, coaching
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Mental Health Services, Preventive Health Services, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
