Cited by 210Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Sciences Research and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disruptive innovations for designing and diffusing evidence-based interventions

Open access
Rotheram-Borus, Mary Jane, Swendeman, Dallas, Chorpita, Bruce F.·2012·American Psychologist

Abstract

Evidence-based therapeutic and preventive intervention programs (EBIs) have been growing exponentially. Yet EBIs have not been broadly adopted in the United States. In order for our EBI science to significantly reduce disease burden, we need to critically reexamine our scientific conventions and norms. Innovation may be spurred by reexamining the traditional biomedical model for validating, implementing, and diffusing EBI products and science. The model of disruptive innovations suggests that we reengineer EBIs on the basis of their most robust features in order to serve more people in less time and at lower cost. A disruptive innovation provides a simpler and less expensive alternative that meets the essential needs for the majority of consumers and is more accessible, scalable, replicable, and sustainable. Examples of disruptive innovations from other fields include minute clinics embedded in retail chain drug stores, $2 generic eyeglasses, automated teller machines, and telemedicine. Four new research approaches will be required to support disruptive innovations in EBI science: synthesize common elements across EBIs; experiment with new delivery formats (e.g., consumer controlled, self-directed, brief, paraprofessional, coaching, and technology and media strategies); adopt market strategies to promote and diffuse EBI science, knowledge, and products; and adopt continuous quality improvement as a research paradigm for systematically improving EBIs, based on ongoing monitoring data and feedback. EBI science can have more impact if it can better leverage what we know from existing EBIs in order to inspire, engage, inform, and support families and children to adopt and sustain healthy daily routines and lifestyles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028180

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. California Healthcare Foundation 2006 The minute clinic movement: Model for the future or 60 seconds of fame? 7 18 http://www.chcf.org/press/view.cfm?itemID=123240
  2. Fishbein M Bandura A Triandis HC Factors influencing behavior and behavior change Final Report- NIMH Theorists Workshop Washington, DC National Institute of Mental Health 1991
  3. Pine JB Gilmore JH 1999 The Experience Economy Cambridge, MA Harvard Business School Press
  4. Sutherland A Thompson B 2001 Kidfluence: Why kids today mean business Toronto, Canada McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Swendeman, D., & Chorpita, B. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2012
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
463-476
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2161464172
Cited by
210
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
FWCI
51.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH058107)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
disruptive innovation, evidence-based interventions, diffusion of innovations, implementation science, biomedical model, intervention scalability, continuous quality improvement, market strategy, self-guided intervention, coaching
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Mental Health Services, Preventive Health Services, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review