Cited by 38Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Specificity and modifiability of cognitive biases in hypochondriasis.

Gropalis, Maria, Bleichhardt, Gaby, Hiller, Wolfgang, Witthöft, Michael·2013·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: According to cognitive-behavioral models of hypochondriasis (HYP), biased attentional and memory processes related to health threat stimuli are crucial for the development and maintenance of severe health anxiety. Little is known about the specificity, temporal stability, and modifiability of these biases via psychotherapy. METHOD: In an emotional Stroop and subsequent recognition task, the authors compared attention and memory processes for health-related words (illnesses, bodily complaints, and panic-related words) in patients with HYP (n = 32), other somatoform disorders (SFD; n = 27), and panic disorder (PD; n = 25). A control group consisted of 31 healthy participants (CG). All patients were reexamined after 4 months of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). RESULTS: Patients with HYP showed a significant attentional bias toward all 3 target word categories. Evidence for a specific bias was found only for the PD group. General recognition performance for health threat and neutral words was best in the HYP group. After therapy, attentional bias had clearly decreased in the HYP and SFD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HYP can be characterized by attentional bias and more elaborate verbal processing. These irregularities tend to disappear after psychotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028493

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Illness-related bias occurs in highly health-anxious individuals and patients with pathological HA, and describes the tendency to focus on information that confirms health worries and to ignore contradictory information.

    “It was found to occur in highly health-anxious individuals [97,98], as well as in patients with pathological HA [99-101] and describes the tendency to focus on information that confirms their health worries and to ignore information that is contradictory [58].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gropalis, M., Bleichhardt, G., Hiller, W., & Witthöft, M.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2013-06
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
558-565
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2014594548
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
health anxiety, cognitive biases, attentional bias, health hazards, somatoform disorders, panic disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotional Stroop task, recognition memory, temporal stability
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Somatoform Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review