Cited by 20Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Neural correlates of an attentional bias to health-threatening stimuli in individuals with pathological health anxiety

Open access
Mier, Daniela, Bailer, Josef, Ofer, Julia, Kerstner, Tobias, Zamoscik, Vera, Rist, Fred, Witthöft, Michael, Diener, Carsten·2017·Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

Abstract

Background: An attentional bias to health-threat stimuli is assumed to represent the primary pathogenetic factor for the development and maintenance of pathological health anxiety (PHA; formerly termed “hypochondriasis”). However, little is known about the neural basis of this attentional bias in individuals with PHA. Methods: A group of patients with PHA, a group of depressed patients and a healthy control group completed an emotional Stroop task with health-threat (body symptom and illness) words and neutral control words while undergoing functional MRI. Results: We included 33 patients with PHA, 28 depressed patients and 31 controls in our analyses. As reflected in reaction times, patients with PHA showed a significantly stronger attentional bias to health-threat words than both control groups. In addition, patients with PHA showed increased amygdala and rostral anterior cingulate cortex activation for body symptom, but not for illness words. Moreover, only in patients with PHA amygdala activation in response to symptom words was positively associated with higher arousal and more negative valence ratings of the body symptom word material. Limitations: A control group of patients with an anxiety disorder but without PHA would have helped to define the specificity of the results for PHA. Conclusion: The attentional bias observed in patients with PHA is associated with hyperactivation in response to body symptom words in brain regions that are crucial for an arousal-related fear response (e.g., the amygdala) and for resolving emotional interference (e.g., the rostral anterior cingulate cortex). The findings have important implications for the nosological classification of PHA and suggest the application of innovative exposure-based interventions for the treatment of PHA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/jpn.160081

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using the emotional stroop task and implicit association test have shown increased amygdala activation, as well as activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex and right posterior parietal cortex and nucleus accumbens, in response to body-symptom words between health anxious and healthy controls.

    “Studies using the emotional stroop task and implicit association test have both showed increased amygdala activation, as well as activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex [62] and right posterior parietal cortex and nucleus accumbens [63] in response to body-symptom words between health anxious and healthy controls.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Fink P, Ornbol E, Christensen KS. The outcome of health anxiety in primary care. A twoyear followup study on health care costs and selfrated health. PLoS One 2010;5:e9873.
  2. Barsky AJ, Wyshak G. Hypochondriasis and somatosensory am plification. Br J Psychiatry 1990;157:4049.
  3. Williams P. The psychopathology of selfassessed health: a cognitive approach to health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Cognit Ther Res 2004;28:62944.
  4. Williams JMG, Watts FN, MacLeod C, et al. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
  5. BarHaim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, et al. Threatrelated attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a metaanalytic study. Psychol Bull 2007;133:124.
  6. Peckham AD, McHugh RK, Otto MW. A metaanalysis of the magni tude of biased attention in depression. Depress Anxiety 2010; 27: 113542.
  7. Witthöft M, Mier D, Ofer J, et al. Neuronal and behavioral corre lates of health anxiety: results of an illnessrelated emotional stroop task. Neuropsychobiology 2013;67:93102.
  8. van den Heuvel OA, Veltman DJ, Groenewegen HJ, et al. Disorderspecific neuroanatomical correlates of attentional bias in obsessivecompulsive disorder, panic disorder, and hypochondri asis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:92233.
  9. Witthöft M, Kerstner T, Ofer J, et al. Cognitive biases in patho logical health anxiety the contribution of attention, memory, and evaluation processes. Clin Psychol Sci 2016;4:46479.
  10. Diener C, Kuehner C, Brusniak W, et al. A metaanalysis of neuro functional imaging studies of emotion and cognition in major de pression. Neuroimage 2012;61:67785.
  11. Bailer J, Kerstner T, Witthoft M, et al. Health anxiety and hypo chondriasis in the light of DSM5. Anxiety Stress Coping 2016; 29:21939.
  12. Bailer J, Rist F, Müller T, et al. Erfassung von Krankheitsangst mit dem Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI) [German validation of the Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI)]. Verhaltensther Ver- haltensmed 2013;34:37898.
  13. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the selfassessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1994; 25:4959.
  14. Pezawas L, MeyerLindenberg A, Drabant EM, et al. 5HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulateamygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:82834.
  15. Lee H, Turkel JE, Cotter SP, et al. Attentional bias toward person ally relevant healththreat words. Anxiety Stress Coping 2013; 26: 493507.
  16. Cuthbert BN. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2014;13:2835.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mier, D., Bailer, J., Ofer, J., Kerstner, T., Zamoscik, V., Rist, F., Witthöft, M., & Diener, C.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Published
2017-05
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
200-209
ISSN
  • 1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2434
OpenAlex
W2608746324
Cited by
20
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG BA1597/5-1, BA1597/5-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
health anxiety, attentional bias, amygdala activation, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, emotional Stroop task, somatic symptoms, emotional arousal, emotional valence, depression, nosological classification, exposure therapy
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reaction Time, Reading, Visual Perception, Stroop Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review