Cited by 237Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cyberchondria: parsing health anxiety from online behavior

Open access
Doherty-Torstrick, Emily R., Walton, Kate E., Fallon, Brian A.·2016·Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background Individuals with questions about their health often turn to the Internet for information about their symptoms, but the degree to which health anxiety is related to online checking, and clinical variables, remains unclear. The clinical profiles of highly anxious Internet checkers, and the relationship to checking behavior itself, have not previously been reported.Objective In this article, we test the hypothesis, derived from cognitive-behavioral models, that individuals with higher levels of illness anxiety would recall having experienced worsening anxiety after reassurance-seeking on the Internet.Method Data from 731 volunteers who endorsed engaging in online symptom-searching were collected using an online questionnaire. Severity of health anxiety was assessed with the Whiteley Index, functional impairment with the Sheehan Disability Scale, and distress recall during and after searching with a modified version of the Clinician׳s Global Impairment scale. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine variables contributing to distress during and after Internet checking.Results Severity of illness anxiety on the Whiteley Index was the strongest predictor of increase in anxiety associated with, and consequent to, online symptom-searching. Individuals with high illness anxiety recalled feeling worse after online symptom-checking, whereas those with low illness anxiety recalled relief. Longer-duration online health-related use was associated with increased functional impairment, less education, and increased anxiety during and after checking.Conclusion Because individuals with moderate-high levels of illness anxiety recall experiencing more anxiety during and after searching, such searching may be detrimental to their health. If replicated in controlled experimental settings, this would suggest that individuals with illness anxiety should be advised to avoid using the Internet for illness-related information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psym.2016.02.002

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Doherty-Torstrick et al found that 32.8% of the high HA group and 71.2% of the low HA group experienced no impact or decreased anxiety during and after health-related internet use.

    “Doherty-Torstrick et al [82] found that a considerable proportion of their sample (32.8% in the high HA group and 71.2% in the low HA group) experienced no impact or decreased anxiety during and after health-related internet use.”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Results (Sample Characteristics) support 32.8% for the high-health-anxiety group and 71.2% for the low-health-anxiety group as the proportions without worsening anxiety *after* checking: the reported worsening rates were 67.2% and 28.8%. During checking, the reported worsening rates were 68.3% and 40.0%, so the quoted percentages do not apply to that period. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Luo G Tang C Yang H Wei X A specialized search engine for medical information Paper presented at the Proceedings of 16th Annual World Wide Web Conference 2007 http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/∼gangluo/medsearch.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doherty-Torstrick, E. R., Walton, K. E., & Fallon, B. A.
Affiliations
  • St. John's University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
390-400
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2256898650
Cited by
237
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071456)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cyberchondria, health anxiety, fear of illness, reassurance seeking, online health information seeking, Whiteley Index, functional disability, distress, cognitive-behavioral model
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review