The DOI matches its Crossref record; 663 of the 667 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards
Open accessAbstract
This article systematically reviews the research design and methodological characteristics of single-case experimental design (SCED) research published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2010. SCEDs provide researchers with a flexible and viable alternative to group designs with large sample sizes. However, methodological challenges have precluded widespread implementation and acceptance of the SCED as a viable complementary methodology to the predominant group design. This article includes a description of the research design, measurement, and analysis domains distinctive to the SCED; a discussion of the results within the framework of contemporary standards and guidelines in the field; and a presentation of updated benchmarks for key characteristics (e.g., baseline sampling, method of analysis), and overall, it provides researchers and reviewers with a resource for conducting and evaluating SCED research. The results of the systematic review of 409 studies suggest that recently published SCED research is largely in accordance with contemporary criteria for experimental quality. Analytic method emerged as an area of discord. Comparison of the findings of this review with historical estimates of the use of statistical analysis indicates an upward trend, but visual analysis remains the most common analytic method and also garners the most support among those entities providing SCED standards. Although consensus exists along key dimensions of single-case research design, and researchers appear to be practicing within these parameters, there remains a need for further evaluation of assessment and sampling techniques and data analytic methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A minimum of 5 points per phase is considered the standard in multiple baseline design (Smith 2012).”
From Towards a Treatment for Intolerance of Uncertainty for Autistic Adults: A Single Case Experimental Design Study. (2018) · cites this paper as Smith 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The increasing baseline rates for some incident types may have contributed to the significant declines observed during implementation. However, program effects persisted after excluding agencies with significant baseline trends, making regression to the mean a less plausible explanation for our findings (Smith 2012).”
From Intervening at the Setting Level to Prevent Behavioral Incidents in Residential Child Care: Efficacy of the CARE Program Model (2016) · cites this paper as Smith 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Single case experimental designs (SCED) provide a pragmatic alternative that, when well-designed and executed, rival the scientific rigor of randomized controlled trials while requiring far fewer participants (Barlow, Nock, & Hersen, 2008; Smith, 2012; Vilardaga, 2014).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as Smith, 2012
In the citing paper
“We followed guidelines in the design, analysis and reporting of case series to ensure the method was applied optimally”
From Bringing light into darkness: A multiple baseline mixed methods case series evaluation of Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) (2019) · cites this paper as Smith, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Notice of Redundant Publication
(2011) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.221 · Cited by 26
RetractedDevlin, P. (2008) · Education and training in developmental disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416470804300409 · Cited by 16
RetractedMaximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Book Review: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M. D., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,410
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Breitung, J., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076916 · Cited by 11,114
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
Fildes, R. A., Harvey, A. C., West, M., & Harrison, J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583225 · Cited by 4,683
The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis
Jones, F. N., & Skinner, B. F. (1939) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416495 · Cited by 4,388
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Diggle P Liang KY 2001 Analyses of longitudinal data New York Oxford University Press
- Kratochwill TR Chair Members of the Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology 2003 Procedural and coding manual for review of evidence-based interventions Retrieved July 18, 2011 from http://www.sp-ebi.org/documents/_workingfiles/EBImanual1.pdf
- Andrews-Salvia M Roy N Cameron RM 2003 Evaluating the effects of memory books for individuals with severe dementia Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 11 1 51 59
- Ardoin SP McCall M Klubnik C 2007 Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities Journal of Behavioral Education 16 1 55 70
- Bermúdez-Ornelas G Hernández-Guzmán L 2008 Tratamiento de una sesión de la fobia específica a las arañas en niños [Treatment of a session of phobia to spiders in children] International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 8 3 779 791
- Bliss SL Skinner CH Adams R 2006 Enhancing an English language learning fifth-grade student’s sight-word reading with a time-delay taped-words intervention School Psychology Review 35 4 663 670
- Cho H Wilke DJ 2005 How has the Violence Against Women Act affected the response of the criminal justice system to domestic violence? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 32 4 125 139
- Clarfield J Stoner G 2005 Research brief: The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD School Psychology Review 34 2 246 254
- Dojo Y Tanaka-Matsumi J Inoue N 2004 Effect of goal setting with a target behavior card on class preparation behavior of children in a regular classroom The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 19 2 148 160
- Endo Y Ohkubo K Gomi Y Noguchi M Takahashi N Takei S Noro F 2007 Application of interdependent group-oriented contingencies to cleaning behaviors of students in an elementary school: Effects of class-wide intervention and social validity The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 22 1 17 30
- Feather JS Ronan KR 2006 Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for abused children with posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot study New Zealand Journal of Psychology 35 3 132 145
- Fujita Y Hasegawa Y 2003 Weight control: Selection of low-calorie food The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 1 3 9
- Gyovai LK Cartledge G Kourea L Yurick A Gibson L 2009 Early reading intervention: Responding to the learning needs of young at-risk English language learners Learning Disability Quarterly 32 3 143 162
- Hastie PA Sharpe T 2006 Implementation guidelines: Introducing a changing-criterion design to hold students accountable in structured physical activity settings Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 7 1 89 91
- Hirasawa N Fujiwara Y Yamane M 2009 Physical arrangements and staff implementation of function-based interventions in school and community settings Japanese Journal of Special Education 46 6 435 446
- Hirayoshi S Nakajima S 2003 Do rats press the lever for longer than the required duration?: Differential reinforcement of response duration and response topography The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 2 99 107
- Killu K Weber KP McLaughlin TF 2001 An evaluation of repeated readings across various counting periods of see to think, think to say, and think to write channels with a university student with learning disabilities Journal of Precision Teaching & Celeration 17 2 39 57
- Li Q Wang X-C Cheng L-G 2008 Multiple-baseline design on pretend game for the rectification of children’s aggressive behavior Chinese Mental Health Journal 22 3 175 178
- Matchett DL Burns MK 2009 Increasing word recognition fluency with an English-language learner Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 10 2 194 206
- Okuda K 2005 Behavioral consultation services for school-refusal students with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders: Token economy and changing reinforcement criteria The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 20 1 2 12
- Okuyama T Isawa S 2010 Right-left discrimination from one’s own and another person’s viewpoint in children with autism: Higher-order conditional discrimination and generalization of viewpoint Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 24 2 2 16
- Ota K 2010 Self-recording and accuracy of writing responses by students with developmental disabilities Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 24 2 17 29
- Saecker LB Skinner CH Sager-Brown K Roberts AS 2009 Using responsiveness data and learning theories to modify interventions: Cover, copy, and compare to enhance number-writing accuracy Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 10 2 171 187
- Sakamoto M Muto T Mochizuki A 2003 Enhancing the self-determination of students with autism: Evaluation of a training package for teachers The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 1 25 37
- Salem S Fazzio D Arnal L Fregeau P Thomson K Martin GL Yu CT 2009 A self-instructional package for teaching university students to conduct discrete-trials teaching with children with autism Journal on Developmental Disabilities 15 1 21 29
- Schneider N Goldstein H 2009 Social Stories™ improve the on-task behavior for children with language impairment Journal of Early Intervention 31 3 250 264
- Smith JD Handler L Nash MR 2010 Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: A replicated single-case time-series design Psychological Assessment 22 3 593 602 10.1037/a0019697 20822271 · DOI
- Watanabe T Kanayama Y Muto T 2007 Improving communication between regular class teachers and teaching assistants: Increasing teachers’ comments by modifying communication cards The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 22 1 39 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 627
Geraldo, A., Dores, A. R., Castro‐Caldas, A., & Barbosa, F. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02989-0 · Cited by 4
“Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that methodologies other than randomized controlled trials, such as single case-studies or case series, are gaining strength in the scientific community and are of great value in the case of neurocognitive rehabilitation, for providing a more detailed perspective on the impact of th…”
BackgroundYulilla, D., & Cahyono, R. (2022) · Psikostudia Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.30872/psikostudia.v11i3.7714 · Cited by 4
“Metode single case menyediakan data kontrol yang bertujuan untuk melihat perbandingan pada subjek tertentu sebelum dan sesudah dilakukannya intervensi (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundHeckaman, K. A., Ernest, J. M., & Scheffler, A. J. (2018) · SRATE journal · Cited by 4
Tanious, R., & Onghena, P. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-026-09624-z · Cited by 3
“For example, Smith ( 2012) found that out of all the reviewed SCEDs over a 10-year period, a staggering 52% did not report the analytical methods used.”
Rethinking coping in chronic pain: a systematic review and dynamic interaction model of coping
Blandhol, M., Lee, S. Y., & Ellingsen, D. (2026) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000001421 · Cited by 4
“113 This method could investigate changes in coping processes during psychological interventions that target coping-related factors, relative to a within-subject baseline period.”
Do not disturb: Visitors' effect on the behavior and welfare of female and male big cats in zoos
Spiezio, C., Galardi, E. G., Sandri, C., & Regaiolli, B. (2023) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21789 · Cited by 4
Prins, P., & Nijhof, K. S. (2024) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.13237 · Cited by 3
Intervention research in anorexia nervosa – a plea for single case experimental designs
Melles, H., Lemmens, L. H. J. M., & Jansen, A. T. M. (2025) · Eating Disorders · doi:10.1080/10640266.2025.2471218 · Cited by 3
“Changes in these variables that occur during phase B can then be causally linked to the intervention being studied, while maximizing internal and external validity (Kazdin, 2019, 2021; Onghena & Edgington, 2005; Smith, 2012).”
Assessing consistency of effects when applying multilevel models to single-case data
Manolov, R., & Ferron, J. M. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01417-0 · Cited by 3
“Actually, several reviews of published SCED research suggest that multiple-baseline designs are the most commonly used designs (Hammond & Gast, 2010; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012), present in more than half of the articles reviewed.”
BackgroundSharma, S., & Palomares, R. S. (2021) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1909038 · Cited by 3
McInerney, M., Imms, C., Carding, P. N., & Reddihough, D. S. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100872 · Cited by 3
“SCEDs are a useful alternative experimental design choice when evaluating intervention effectiveness [46,47].”
Bodén, R., Nilsson, J., Walles, I., Larsson, E. K. B., Kristiansen, I., Fällmar, D., & Persson, J. (2021) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2021.2017303 · Cited by 3
“The fi rst part of this study is a single-case experimental research design (Smith, 2012), with repeated measures during and after alternating real and sham intervention.”
MethodOuss, L., Beauquier‐Maccotta, B., Hervé, M.-J., Bompard, C., Desvignes, C., Velásquez, P., Serpa, S. R., & Quirot, B. (2023) · Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique · doi:10.1016/j.amp.2022.11.017 · Cited by 3
Bayes factor for single-case ABAB design data
Yamada, T., & Okada, K. (2023) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-023-00206-1 · Cited by 3
“The ABAB design is the second most frequently used design of SCEDs after multiple baseline designs (Shadish & Sullivan 2011; Smith 2012; Tanious & Onghena 2021).”
ABkPowerCalculator: An App to Compute Power for Balanced (AB) k Single Case Experimental Designs
Batley, P. N., Thamaran, M., & Hedges, L. V. (2023) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2023.2261229 · Cited by 3
“As discussed above, the app only computes power for (AB) k designs which are one type of SCEDs and multiple baseline designs that are widely used in SCEDs (Pustejovsky et al., 2019; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012) are not addressed here.”
MethodKuswardani, H. P., Suprapti, V., & Paramita, P. P. (2023) · Psikostudia Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.30872/psikostudia.v12i3.11033 · Cited by 3
“Penelitian ini melibatkan perbandingan antara dua periode waktu eksperimental (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundWan‐Vermeer, R., Bouwmeester, S., & Starrenburg, A. (2024) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2948 · Cited by 3
Hornsby, E. A., & Johnston, L. M. (2024) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.012 · Cited by 3
Veeger, J. D. K., Stapersma, L., Lebowitz, E. R., Zijlstra, B. J. H., Lindauer, R., Utens, E. M. W. J., & Huyser, C. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101456 · Cited by 3
“SCED is specifically suitable for innovative interventions for relatively small populations (such as youth with complex OCD) [22 – 24].”
Single-case design and evaluation in R: An introduction and tutorial for school psychologists
McGill, R. J. (2016) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1173610 · Cited by 3
“In contrast to traditional control-group designs, an individual serves as his or her own control in SCD (Smith, 2012).”
MethodResultCalcagni, N., & Gana, K. (2019) · Pratiques Psychologiques · doi:10.1016/j.prps.2018.11.004 · Cited by 3
Facing the challenges of single-case experimental methodology
McDonald, S. (2014) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987051 · Cited by 3
“Despite these problems with Approach A, the status of Approach B designs in singlecase research is controversial due to the abandonment of the basic criteria of repetition (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodOttley, J. R., Rahn, N. L., Coogle, C. G., Ferron, J. M., & Storie, S. (2018) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2018.1492296 · Cited by 5
“Scholars have used multilevel modeling to effectively evaluate changes in outcome trajectories and determine whether outcomes were related to other covariates (i.e., the additional independent variables described in “Measures”; see Smith, 2012).”
MethodInfluentialHsueh, P.-Y. S., Das, S., Maduri, C., & Kelly, K. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3
Melo-Dias, C., Gonçalves, C., Sousa, D., Pereira, G. M. S., Ferreira, J. A., Façanha, J., Rosa, A., Pinto, A., Carvalho, A. L. D. O., & Rodrigues, J. (2019) · Millenium - Journal of Education Technologies and Health · doi:10.29352/mill0210.04.00239 · Cited by 3
Laureano, B., & Falligant, J. M. (2022) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/01454455221099648 · Cited by 3
“Visual analysis is the primary method that clinicians and researchers use for evaluating behavioral data within SCEDs (e.g., Baer, 1977; Fisher & Lerman, 2014; Smith, 2012).”
MethodDekkers, T., Heirbaut, T., Schouten, S. E., Kelders, S. M., Jong, N. B.-D., Ludden, G., Deenik, J., Bouman, Y. H. A., & Kip, H. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/37727 · Cited by 3
“In an SCED, the intervention is systematically manipulated across multiple phases of introduction and withdrawal while the outcome variable is measured repeatedly and frequently [36-38].”
Berardi, V., Carretero-González, R., Bellettiere, J., Adams, M. A., Hughes, S. C., & Hovell, M. F. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.023 · Cited by 3
“The data sets used within these texts are representative of the current status quo, as demonstrated by a meta-analysis of 409 SCDs, which reported that the average number of observations in the baseline phase was 10.22 [6].”
InfluentialComparing Visual and Statistical Analysis in Single-Subject Studies
Harrington, M. A. (2013) · doi:10.23860/diss-harrington-magdalena-2013 · Cited by 3
Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards by listed companies in Nigeria
Ogbenjuwa, E. I. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 3
Number of participants required for common designs in psychology: A power analysisPreprint
Brysbaert, M. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2v4yx · Cited by 3
Lee, S. A. W., & Gates, K. M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u8mcp · Cited by 3
Type I error rates and power of two randomization test procedures for the changing criterion design
Manolov, R., & Tanious, R. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02303-1 · Cited by 2
“…data analytical procedures (e.g., Baek & Ferron, 2013; Bishara et al., 2021; De & Onghena, 2022; Hedges et al., 2023; Petit-Bois et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2012), including randomization tests (Bouwmeester & Jongerling, 2020; Fer-ron & Onghena, 1996; Ferron & Sentovich, 2002; Levin et al.,…”
MethodDelineamento de caso único na pesquisa em psicologia clínica
de Paulo, L. C. S., & Pilatti, P. (2024) · Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva · doi:10.31505/rbtcc.v26i1.1786 · Cited by 2
Ingeman, K., Frydendal, D. H., Frostholm, L., Bjerre-Nielsen, E., Wellnitz, K. B., Onghena, P., Wright, K. D., & Rask, C. U. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/65396 · Cited by 1
Xue, Y., Moeyaert, M., Baek, E., Solomon, B. G., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-025-09603-w · Cited by 2
“Despite the high prevalence of autocorrelation in SCED data, review studies indicated that autocorrelation has been rarely dealt with (Jam-shidi et al., 2022; Smith, 2012).”
Reporting guidelines for single-case experimental design research: Recommendations for data analysis
Kratochwill, T. R., Ferron, J. M., & Levin, J. R. (2026) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101528 · Cited by 3
Lavefjord, A., Sundström, F., Hammar, A., Preihs, L., van de Leur, J. C., Forslund, S., Scholten, S., Magnusson, K., Klintwall, L., Buhrman, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2026.100997 · Cited by 2
A Clinical Case Series of Integrated Psychotherapy in Major Depressive Disorder
Duarte, L. G., Teixeira, A. G., de Oliveira, A. C. R., de Castro, D. A., da Silva, J. M., & Carvalho, R. V. (2026) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-026-09732-x · Cited by 2
Beyond RCTs—Better Research Designs and Methods for Psychosocial Efficacy Studies in Mental Health
Lecomte, T., Raugh, I. M., Caiada, M., & Menon, M. (2026) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437261456381 · Cited by 2
“22,26,27 If a treatment is hypothesized as only ef fi cacious when used (e.g., a mindfulness-based treatment), an A-B-A model could be of interest (see Figure 1).”
Willmes, K. (2014) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987048 · Cited by 2
“HBN take on the view of Smith (2012) that there “remains a need for sound analytic methods” (Howard et al., 2014, p. 527) and provide, both, a sound critique of the limitations of various designs and statistical procedures often employed in single-case intervention studies as well as a coherent…”
MethodStyles, J., & Martin, R. J. (2017) · Advances in Physical Education · doi:10.4236/ape.2017.72015 · Cited by 2
“Smith (2012) states that a single case study approach refers “to the participant or cluster of participants (e.”
BackgroundInfluentialZink, H. H., Norman, E. R. V., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2023) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23120 · Cited by 2
Carson, J., Demetriou, K., Barlow, G., Wright, K. A., Loades, M. E., & Dunn, B. D. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104646 · Cited by 2
A Problem‐Solving Tool for Single‐Case Design Selection in Practice
Colombo, R. A., & Wallace, M. D. (2024) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.2065 · Cited by 2
Janssen, E. P. J., Spauwen, P. J. J., Rijnen, S. J. M., & Ponds, R. (2025) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2024.2444999 · Cited by 2
“For each participant, a SCED was used in which baseline phase (A) length of either 2, 3 or 4 weeks was randomized across participants (Onghena & Edgington, 2005; Smith, 2012) using start-point randomization (Michiels & Onghena, 2019).”
Leijse, M. M. L., van Dam, L., van der Pol, T. M., Breuk, R., & Popma, A. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/64756 · Cited by 2
“Therefore, to gain a better understanding of individual differences and enable within-and between-participants comparisons, at least 9 to 10 participants will be included in the data analyses [67].”
InfluentialYamada, T., & Okada, K. (2025) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-025-00259-4 · Cited by 2
“Several reviews have highlighted relatively low usage rates: Shadish and Sullivan (2011) reported 8.0% usage for ATD and 2.6% for CCD; Smith (2012) reported 6% for ATD and 4% for CCD; and Tanious and Onghena (2021) reported 14.42% for ATD, and 1.42% for CCD.”
InfluentialExploring sustainable servicescape and geo-arbitrage to foster revisit intentions in rural homestays
Tiwana, R. K., Tandon, U., & Mittal, A. (2025) · Tourism Recreation Research · doi:10.1080/02508281.2025.2521291 · Cited by 2
“In this study, since the sampling frame was not available, we preferred non-probability sampling methods (Smith, 2012).”
O ensino de habilidades terapêuticas em FAP: uma revisão de literatura
Ferreira, V. S. (2020) · Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento · doi:10.18761/pac.2020.v11.n2.08 · Cited by 2
Ambulatory Assessment in Neuropsychology
Schlotz, W., & Powell, D. (2014) · Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie · doi:10.1024/1016-264x/a000140 · Cited by 2
“Similarly, ambulatory assessment methods provide data suitable for single case experimental designs that can reveal useful information for clinical practice (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundCorreia, N. E. F. G., Daniel, J. R., & Aguiar, C. (2014) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.619 · Cited by 2
Assigning and combining probabilities in single-case studies: A second study
Manolov, R., & Solanas, A. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0332-3
“In that sense, and in relation to external validity, the importance of the synthesis and comparison of effect size measures (Smith, 2012) and meta-analysis (Burns, 2012) has been highlighted.”
BackgroundAnsaldo, J., Palazzolo, J., & Corveleyn, X. (2018) · NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie · doi:10.1016/j.npg.2018.04.002 · Cited by 2
Kelly, G., & Shanley, J. (2018) · International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · doi:10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.8.437 · Cited by 2
Improving the Methodological Quality of Single-Case Experimental Design Meta-Analysis
Jamshidi, L. (2018) · JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.29245/2578-2959/2018/4.1140 · Cited by 2
Effects of the STOP and LIST Strategy on the Writing Performance of Struggling Fourth Graders
Grünke, M., Nobel, K., & Bracht, J. (2019) · Journal of Education and Learning · doi:10.5539/jel.v8n2p1 · Cited by 2
“To detect autocorrelation in the data, it is often suggested to set the minimum number of baseline probes at five (e.g., Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundSuso‐Ribera, C., Molinari, G., & García‐Palacios, A. (2019) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25872-6_12 · Cited by 2
“…the latter, while SCDs are usually seen as having limited external validity because they can be applied to a single individual, replications of the single effect in an increased number of subjects is perfectly possible (and recommended), thus increasing the generalizability of fi ndings [3, 4].”
BackgroundBowen, A., Maguire, T. O., & Newman‐Taylor, K. (2019) · Perspectives in Public Health · doi:10.1177/1757913919852121 · Cited by 2
Desnos, Y., Gepner, B., Bellusso, P., & Segond, H. (2019) · Bulletin de psychologie · doi:10.3917/bupsy.562.0259 · Cited by 2
Digital equipment – a game changer for police training?! Experiences of the Bavarian Police training
Fuchs, M. (2022) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2022.2067157 · Cited by 3
“…measurement at the beginning of the police training, which will serve as comparison with the subsequent phases but also as comparison to the control group (Smith, 2012) to gain more validity about the influence of digital devices on learning interest and academic performance in police training.”
BackgroundTesting Concerns about Technology's Behavioral Impacts with N-of-one Trials
Matias, J. N., Pennington, E., & Chan, Z. T. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533227 · Cited by 2
“Scientists also benefit from these studies by meta-analyzing the results together in a search for ways to explain differences in treatment effects [35, 59].”
BackgroundKelly, G., Pool, J., Hamilton, C., & Rodda, J. (2023) · International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · doi:10.12968/ijtr.2022.0121 · Cited by 2
A Single Case Evaluation of an Emotion Regulation Training in Adolescents
Boelens, E., Wante, L., Vervoort, L., Verbeken, S., Goossens, L., & Braet, C. (2025) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.1337 · Cited by 2
Protocol: New approaches to managing the social deficits of Turner Syndrome using the PEERS program
Wolstencroft, J., Mandy, W., & Skuse, D. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.15489.2 · Cited by 2
Byiers, B. J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_92-1 · Cited by 2
Malchus, K. (2015) · PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) · Cited by 2
Single-System Research Designs
Wong, S. E. (2014) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195389678-0191 · Cited by 2
Alresheed, F. (2018) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · Cited by 2
Editorial: Creating Evidence From Real World Patient Digital Data
Nikles, J., Daza, E. J., McDonald, S., Hekler, E. B., & Schork, N. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2020.636996 · Cited by 2
“SCDs can complement RCTs in a wide range of clinical research and practice contexts (Gabler et al., 2011; Smith, 2012; Punja et al., 2016; McDonald et al., 2017; Shaffer et al., 2018; Hekler et al., 2019).”
BackgroundJewell, T. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ru8sd · Cited by 2
Tømmerås, T., Backer‐Grøndahl, A., Arnesen, A., Apeland, A., Laland, H., Askeland, E., Kjøbli, J., Idsøe, T., Grønlie, A. A., Gomez, M. B., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.08.16.22278822 · Cited by 3
“17 individual, both when introducing the intervention and throughout the B phase (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundPsychiatric Neuroimaging Designs for Individualised, Cohort, and Population StudiesPreprint
Gell, M., Noble, S., Laumann, T. O., Nelson, S. M., & Tervo‐Clemmens, B. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/278ef · Cited by 2
The effects of a self-regulated writing Intervention on English learners' academic writing skills
Akhmedjanova, D. R. (2020) · doi:10.54014/ctf1-vh9s · Cited by 2
The Application of CBT for Adults with Learning Disabilities
Serfaty, M., Broadway-Horner, M., & Hassiotis, A. (2021) · Evidence-Based Treatment for Anxiety Disorders and Depression · doi:10.1017/9781108355605.030 · Cited by 1
The impact of online social games on E-learning usage among female students
Mahmood, A. I., Yusof, S. A. M., & Jambak, M. I. (2016) · doi:10.1109/icggag.2016.8052647 · Cited by 1
“Meanwhile, on a general perspective to experimental research design, it has been discovered to be a typical methodological design in the realm of examining causal relationships between variables [21].”
BackgroundGrewal, K. S., Grewal, E. S., Cammer, A. L., McWilliams, L. A., Spiteri, R. J., & O’Connell, M. E. (2024) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acae115 · Cited by 1
“Importantly, we selected minimum three-week intervals based on single-case experimental design guidelines (Smith, 2012).”
Liu, Y. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05913-6 · Cited by 1
“It is worth noting that single-authored systematic or scoping review studies are not uncommon (Dobson, 2023; Fennell, 2021; Smith, 2012).”
Zinzen, J., van Hooren, S., Drost, R. M. W. A., Kavelaars, X., Rohrbach, P. J., Thewissen, V., Evers, S., & Boselie, J. J. L. M. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03860-0 · Cited by 1
Chew, K. A., Cazanis, A., Hymus, S., Grant, S., Ponsford, J. L., & Gould, K. R. (2026) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2605172 · Cited by 1
Kumar, R., Vedwan, K. K., & Singh, V. (2026) · Sport Sciences for Health · doi:10.1007/s11332-026-01688-8 · Cited by 2
“During this period, the participant advanced in adaptive sports and secured a bronze medal at the 2024 Paralympic Games [27–29].”
Kershaw, J., Kellett, S., Taylor, P. J., Gaskell, C., & Airnes, Z. (2026) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/15346501261436753 · Cited by 1
“As reformulation/recognition phases for all TPs/TPPs demonstrated stability, it was not necessary to make any statistical adjustments.”
InfluentialPetkovski, M., Knipschild, R., Gevers, T., & Lenferink, L. I. M. (2026) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2026.2643984 · Cited by 1
“The psychometric properties of the MHC-SF are good (Franken et al., 2018; Keyes et al., 2008; Lamers et al., 2011, 2012).”
Votaw, V. R., Rosen, R. S., Peckham, A., London, Z., Philpotts, L. L., Weiss, R. D., McHugh, R. K., & Streck, J. M. (2026) · Journal of Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1080/15504263.2026.2638194 · Cited by 1
“…on depression symptoms by staggering or varying the administration of psychosocial treatment among participants receiving buprenorphine (i.e., multiple base-line/combined series design) and observing whether depression symptoms vary significantly with psycho-social treatment (Smith, 2012).”
Sparks, K., Akers, J. S., & Liu, R. (2026) · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40489-026-00553-1 · Cited by 1
Matching Analyses as an Evaluative Tool: Characterizing Behavior in Juvenile Residential Settings
Luna, O. (2019) · Cited by 1
Loice, W., Kiprop, D., Ndaita, J., & Ndaita, J. (2020) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i4/7218 · Cited by 3
“Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.”
BackgroundInfluentialNitel ve Nicel Araştırma Tasarımı Uygulamasıyla Etanol Kullanımını ve Etkilerinin Anlaşılması
Yavuz, Ö. (2022) · European Journal of Science and Technology · doi:10.31590/ejosat.1039621 · Cited by 1
Purrington, J. (2022) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x22000332 · Cited by 1
“Analytic principles from single case experimental design research were utilised as the intervention can be evaluated for its efficacy due to the ‘AB’ design (McMillan and Morley, 2010; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodGledhill, L. J., Veale, D. M., Drury, H., Bream, V., & Onwumere, J. (2022) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2022.100745 · Cited by 1
Miljković, E. (2023) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-023-00505-2 · Cited by 1
“When it comes to analyzing the individual case studies, there is no consensus on the best method (Brossart et al., 2018 ; Campbell, 2004 ; Parker et al., 2011a , b; Smith, 2012 ; Tarlow, 2016 ).”
MethodShakya, S., Gopalakrishnan, S., Anaby, D., Shamantha Madapura, S., Shetty, H. B., Shah, H. H., Venkatesan, V. S., & Rao, B. K. (2024) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2024.102649 · Cited by 1
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies · doi:10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.3.2953 · Cited by 1
Sibley, R. (2024) · FPOP Bulletin: Psychology of Older People · doi:10.53841/bpsfpop.2024.1.167.29 · Cited by 1
Nitz, J., Volpe, R. J., Hagen, T., Krull, J., Hennemann, T., & Hanisch, C. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00231-6 · Cited by 1
“This methodology facilitates accurate statements about student development using regression models [34–36].”
Hekmati, I., Ranjbar, H. A., Sadigh, L. M., & Eskin, M. (2024) · International Journal of Systemic Therapy · doi:10.1080/2692398x.2024.2400378 · Cited by 2
“According to Smith (2012), a lack of a straightforward, comprehensive approach across datasets is an essential issue in single-subject designs, and there is no agreed-upon statistical method.”
Mindful With Your Baby/Toddler: A Single Case Design (SCD) Study
Schaeffer, M. A., & Potharst, E. S. (2024) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/01632787241297966 · Cited by 2
“SCDs can be a viable, scienti fi cally rigorous alternative to RCTs, not only to assess whether, but also for whom psychological and behavioral interventions work (Borkardt et al., 2008; Borkardt & Nash, 2014; Lobo et al., 2017; Smith, 2012).”
Slatman, S., Heesink, L., Achterkamp, R., Broeks, J., de Oliveira, N. P. M., ter Riet, R., Stegeman, M., & Tabak, M. (2025) · JMIR XR and spatial computing. · doi:10.2196/58784 · Cited by 1
“SCED studies apply detailed assessment at numerous timepoints [15] and have benefits over other designs, including patients serving as their own control and being especially suitable for heterogeneous samples, like CMP patients with a variety of conditions [16].”
Grekov, P., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2025) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101429 · Cited by 3
Jusko, M. L., Smith, J. N., Hayes, T., Campez, M., Timmons, A. C., Morrow, A. S., Lozano, C., Fosco, W. D., Little, K., Villodas, M. T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547251339546 · Cited by 1
“Treatment research in clinical psychology has primarily focused on group-based designs to understand the effectiveness of an intervention and change over time (Morgan & Morgan, 2001; Shadish et al., 2001; Smith, 2012).”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Justin D.
- ORCID
- Smith, Justin D.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-550
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- PMC
- PMC3652808
- OpenAlex
- W1978096047
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 648
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH20012)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- single-case experimental design, study design quality, methodological standards, visual analysis, statistical analysis methods, methodological quality
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Design, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review