The DOI matches its Crossref record; 663 of the 667 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards
Open accessAbstract
This article systematically reviews the research design and methodological characteristics of single-case experimental design (SCED) research published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2010. SCEDs provide researchers with a flexible and viable alternative to group designs with large sample sizes. However, methodological challenges have precluded widespread implementation and acceptance of the SCED as a viable complementary methodology to the predominant group design. This article includes a description of the research design, measurement, and analysis domains distinctive to the SCED; a discussion of the results within the framework of contemporary standards and guidelines in the field; and a presentation of updated benchmarks for key characteristics (e.g., baseline sampling, method of analysis), and overall, it provides researchers and reviewers with a resource for conducting and evaluating SCED research. The results of the systematic review of 409 studies suggest that recently published SCED research is largely in accordance with contemporary criteria for experimental quality. Analytic method emerged as an area of discord. Comparison of the findings of this review with historical estimates of the use of statistical analysis indicates an upward trend, but visual analysis remains the most common analytic method and also garners the most support among those entities providing SCED standards. Although consensus exists along key dimensions of single-case research design, and researchers appear to be practicing within these parameters, there remains a need for further evaluation of assessment and sampling techniques and data analytic methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A minimum of 5 points per phase is considered the standard in multiple baseline design (Smith 2012).”
From Towards a Treatment for Intolerance of Uncertainty for Autistic Adults: A Single Case Experimental Design Study. (2018) · cites this paper as Smith 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The increasing baseline rates for some incident types may have contributed to the significant declines observed during implementation. However, program effects persisted after excluding agencies with significant baseline trends, making regression to the mean a less plausible explanation for our findings (Smith 2012).”
From Intervening at the Setting Level to Prevent Behavioral Incidents in Residential Child Care: Efficacy of the CARE Program Model (2016) · cites this paper as Smith 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Single case experimental designs (SCED) provide a pragmatic alternative that, when well-designed and executed, rival the scientific rigor of randomized controlled trials while requiring far fewer participants (Barlow, Nock, & Hersen, 2008; Smith, 2012; Vilardaga, 2014).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as Smith, 2012
In the citing paper
“We followed guidelines in the design, analysis and reporting of case series to ensure the method was applied optimally”
From Bringing light into darkness: A multiple baseline mixed methods case series evaluation of Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) (2019) · cites this paper as Smith, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Notice of Redundant Publication
(2011) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.221 · Cited by 26
RetractedDevlin, P. (2008) · Education and training in developmental disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416470804300409 · Cited by 16
RetractedMaximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Book Review: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M. D., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,410
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Breitung, J., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076916 · Cited by 11,114
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
Fildes, R. A., Harvey, A. C., West, M., & Harrison, J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583225 · Cited by 4,683
The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis
Jones, F. N., & Skinner, B. F. (1939) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416495 · Cited by 4,388
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Diggle P Liang KY 2001 Analyses of longitudinal data New York Oxford University Press
- Kratochwill TR Chair Members of the Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology 2003 Procedural and coding manual for review of evidence-based interventions Retrieved July 18, 2011 from http://www.sp-ebi.org/documents/_workingfiles/EBImanual1.pdf
- Andrews-Salvia M Roy N Cameron RM 2003 Evaluating the effects of memory books for individuals with severe dementia Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 11 1 51 59
- Ardoin SP McCall M Klubnik C 2007 Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities Journal of Behavioral Education 16 1 55 70
- Bermúdez-Ornelas G Hernández-Guzmán L 2008 Tratamiento de una sesión de la fobia específica a las arañas en niños [Treatment of a session of phobia to spiders in children] International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 8 3 779 791
- Bliss SL Skinner CH Adams R 2006 Enhancing an English language learning fifth-grade student’s sight-word reading with a time-delay taped-words intervention School Psychology Review 35 4 663 670
- Cho H Wilke DJ 2005 How has the Violence Against Women Act affected the response of the criminal justice system to domestic violence? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 32 4 125 139
- Clarfield J Stoner G 2005 Research brief: The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD School Psychology Review 34 2 246 254
- Dojo Y Tanaka-Matsumi J Inoue N 2004 Effect of goal setting with a target behavior card on class preparation behavior of children in a regular classroom The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 19 2 148 160
- Endo Y Ohkubo K Gomi Y Noguchi M Takahashi N Takei S Noro F 2007 Application of interdependent group-oriented contingencies to cleaning behaviors of students in an elementary school: Effects of class-wide intervention and social validity The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 22 1 17 30
- Feather JS Ronan KR 2006 Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for abused children with posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot study New Zealand Journal of Psychology 35 3 132 145
- Fujita Y Hasegawa Y 2003 Weight control: Selection of low-calorie food The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 1 3 9
- Gyovai LK Cartledge G Kourea L Yurick A Gibson L 2009 Early reading intervention: Responding to the learning needs of young at-risk English language learners Learning Disability Quarterly 32 3 143 162
- Hastie PA Sharpe T 2006 Implementation guidelines: Introducing a changing-criterion design to hold students accountable in structured physical activity settings Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 7 1 89 91
- Hirasawa N Fujiwara Y Yamane M 2009 Physical arrangements and staff implementation of function-based interventions in school and community settings Japanese Journal of Special Education 46 6 435 446
- Hirayoshi S Nakajima S 2003 Do rats press the lever for longer than the required duration?: Differential reinforcement of response duration and response topography The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 2 99 107
- Killu K Weber KP McLaughlin TF 2001 An evaluation of repeated readings across various counting periods of see to think, think to say, and think to write channels with a university student with learning disabilities Journal of Precision Teaching & Celeration 17 2 39 57
- Li Q Wang X-C Cheng L-G 2008 Multiple-baseline design on pretend game for the rectification of children’s aggressive behavior Chinese Mental Health Journal 22 3 175 178
- Matchett DL Burns MK 2009 Increasing word recognition fluency with an English-language learner Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 10 2 194 206
- Okuda K 2005 Behavioral consultation services for school-refusal students with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders: Token economy and changing reinforcement criteria The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 20 1 2 12
- Okuyama T Isawa S 2010 Right-left discrimination from one’s own and another person’s viewpoint in children with autism: Higher-order conditional discrimination and generalization of viewpoint Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 24 2 2 16
- Ota K 2010 Self-recording and accuracy of writing responses by students with developmental disabilities Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 24 2 17 29
- Saecker LB Skinner CH Sager-Brown K Roberts AS 2009 Using responsiveness data and learning theories to modify interventions: Cover, copy, and compare to enhance number-writing accuracy Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 10 2 171 187
- Sakamoto M Muto T Mochizuki A 2003 Enhancing the self-determination of students with autism: Evaluation of a training package for teachers The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 1 25 37
- Salem S Fazzio D Arnal L Fregeau P Thomson K Martin GL Yu CT 2009 A self-instructional package for teaching university students to conduct discrete-trials teaching with children with autism Journal on Developmental Disabilities 15 1 21 29
- Schneider N Goldstein H 2009 Social Stories™ improve the on-task behavior for children with language impairment Journal of Early Intervention 31 3 250 264
- Smith JD Handler L Nash MR 2010 Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: A replicated single-case time-series design Psychological Assessment 22 3 593 602 10.1037/a0019697 20822271 · DOI
- Watanabe T Kanayama Y Muto T 2007 Improving communication between regular class teachers and teaching assistants: Increasing teachers’ comments by modifying communication cards The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 22 1 39 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 627
Jamshidi, L., Heyvaert, M., Declercq, L., Fernández‐Castilla, B., Ferron, J. M., Moeyaert, M., Beretvas, S. N., Onghena, P., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2022) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2022.2089334 · Cited by 46
“As Gingerich (1984) pointed out the major difference is that the SCEDs mean difference is standardized using within-case variation instead of between-group variation (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMcDonald, S., Vieira, R., & Johnston, D. W. (2020) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2019.1711096 · Cited by 43
“Published N-of-1 studies in psychology have predominately evaluated N-of-1 data using visual analysis only (McDonald, Quinn, et al., 2017; J. D. Smith, 2012), which has been shown to be unreliable and may not identify small but important effects (Kazdin, 2011; Ninci, Vannest, Willson, & Zhang,…”
MethodSmith, J. D., Eichler, W. C., Norman, K. R., & Smith, S. R. (2014) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.955917 · Cited by 43
“Previous studies suggest that symptom improvement, as reported by clients, should follow the onset of C/TA (e.g., Aschieri & Smith, 2012; J. D. Smith & George, 2012) and that the psychotherapist–client dyad will report an improvement in therapeutic process variables, such as the working alliance…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEvaluating the Coaching for Life Skills online training program: A randomised controlled trial
Camiré, M., Kendellen, K., Rathwell, S., & Turgeon, S. (2020) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101649 · Cited by 42
State of the Science: The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)
Cicero, D. C., Ruggero, C. J., Balling, C. E., Bottera, A. R., Cheli, S., Elkrief, L., Forbush, K. T., Hopwood, C. J., Jonas, K. G., Jutras‐Aswad, D., et al. (2024) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2024.05.001 · Cited by 57
Hurtado‐Parrado, C., & López‐López, W. (2015) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9290-2 · Cited by 41
Guémann, M., Olié, E., Raquin, L., Courtet, P., & Risch, N. (2022) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.2035 · Cited by 40
“Other study designs could be considered, for instance, singlecase experimental design (SCED) studies that are adapted to rare diseases with a variety of specific and clinical situations (Ganz & Ayres, 2018; KrasnyPacini & Evans, 2018; Smith, 2012; Tate et al., 2008).”
BackgroundOne by One: Accumulating Evidence by using Meta-Analytical Procedures for Single-Case Experiments
Onghena, P., Michiels, B., Jamshidi, L., Moeyaert, M., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2017) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1017/brimp.2017.25 · Cited by 41
“…referred to the lack of consensus regarding the statistical analysis and meta ‐ analysis of SCEs (see e.g., Cohen, Feinstein, Masuda, & Vowles, 2014; Smith, 2012), which may even reinforce some researchers in just performing a visual analysis and calculating a simple Percentage of Nonoverlapping…”
BackgroundPustejovsky, J. E., Swan, D. M., & English, K. W. (2019) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445519864264 · Cited by 40
“To draw conclusions in studies that use SCDs, researchers have traditionally relied upon visual inspection of graphed data (Horner & Swoboda, 2014; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialExploring Behavioral Markers of Long-Term Physical Activity Maintenance
Hekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Poothakandiyil, N., Rivera, D. E., Dzierzewski, J. M., Morgan, A. A., McCrae, C. S., Roberts, B. L., Marsiske, M., & Giacobbi, P. R. (2013) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198113496787 · Cited by 41
“These idiographic study designs are being explored more frequently within behavioral research (Deshpande et al., 2011; Molenaar & Campbell, 2009; Rivera et al., 2007; Smith, 2012; Timms et al., 2012; Velicer, 2010).”
Randomization and Data-Analysis Items in Quality Standards for Single-Case Experimental Studies
Heyvaert, M., Wendt, O., den Noortgate, W. V., & Onghena, P. (2015) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/0022466914525239 · Cited by 40
“, t- and F-test) are often not appropriate to analyze SCEs because assumptions of normality are frequently violated for SCE data, SCE data are often autocorrelated, and these tests are insensitive to trends that occur within a phase (Houle, 2009; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUsing the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: An analysis of nonsimulated data
Lanovaz, M. J., Huxley, S. C., & Dufour, M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.394 · Cited by 39
“most single-case experiments, and the last two were similarly identified in a subsequent review by Smith (2012). The second and third authors identified articles that contained at least one single-case graph meeting the following criteria: The initial phase of the graph had to be a baseline condition and include at le…”
Arnold, S. E., Hyman, B. T., Betensky, R. A., & Dodge, H. H. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14063 · Cited by 37
“57 Single-case experimental designs also have played roles in medicine, especially in chronic respiratory, dermatologic, digestive, or orthopedic pain conditions for medication initiation and discontinuation studies.”
Improving Social Cognition in People with Schizophrenia with RC2S: Two Single-Case Studies
Peyroux, É., & Franck, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00066 · Cited by 41
“In contrast to an experimental group design, in which one group is compared with another, participants in a single-subject experiment research provide their own control data for the purpose of comparison in a within-subject, rather than a between-subject, design (65).”
ResultMalboeuf‐Hurtubise, C., Lacourse, É., Herba, C. M., Taylor, G., & Amor, L. B. (2017) · Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1177/2156587217726682 · Cited by 47
“Methods of assessment in n-of-1 trials have been the subject of ongoing debates in the past years.(48) However, although debates regarding the appropriateness and accuracy of different methods persist, recent developments in this field of research have suggested that the use of statistical analyses, when combined with…”
BackgroundMethodBarton, E. E., Meadan, H., & Fettig, A. (2018) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.11.001 · Cited by 36
Secciani, N., Bianchi, M., Meli, E., Volpe, Y., & Ridolfi, A. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.1177/1729881419828197 · Cited by 38
Michela, A., van Peer, J. M., Brammer, J. C., Nies, A., van Rooij, M. M. J. W., Oostenveld, R., Dorrestijn, W., Smit, A. S., Karin Roelofs, A., Klumpers, F., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806163 · Cited by 37
“Given that this was a proof-of-concept study, the number of participants was based on earlier studies using similar SCED methodologies (Ebbinghaus, 2005; Smith, 2012; Smith and Little, 2018; Bossenbroek et al., 2020).”
MethodPetrocchi, N., Cosentino, T., Pellegrini, V., Femia, G., D’Innocenzo, A., & Mancini, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.594277 · Cited by 39
Smith, J. D., Borckardt, J. J., & Nash, M. R. (2011) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.10.001 · Cited by 35
“However, a recently completed systematic review of 409 recently published single-case experiments by Smith (2011) suggests that baseline periods have increased since the Huitema review of 1985: The Smith review found a mean number of 10.22 observations in the baseline phase.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMemory Rehabilitation in Patients with Epilepsy: a Systematic Review
Joplin, S., Stewart, E., Gascoigne, M., & Lah, S. (2018) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-018-9367-7 · Cited by 26
“With respect to assessment of single-case studies methodological quality, this review used the SCED scale, which was considered to be Bthe only psychometrically validated tool for assessing the rigor of SCED methodology^ (Smith 2012, p. 512).”
MethodAre Nomothetic or Ideographic Approaches Superior in Predicting Daily Exercise Behaviors?
Cheung, Y. K., Hsueh, P.-Y. S., Qian, M., Yoon, S., Meli, L., Diaz, K. M., Schwartz, J. E., Kronish, I. M., & Davidson, K. W. (2017) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me16-02-0051 · Cited by 34
“In fact, psychologists and behavioral scientists have developed a variety of ideographic analytical approaches for single-case experimental designs [14,15,16].”
BackgroundSleepBandits: Guided Flexible Self-Experiments for Sleep
Daskalova, N., Yoon, J., Wang, Y., Araujo, C., Beltrán, G., Nugent, N. R., McGeary, J. E., Williams, J. J., & Huang, J. J. S. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376584 · Cited by 34
“Research shows that the difference of means is one of the best analysis methods for self-experiments due to its simplicity [12, 47].”
MethodHow Many Tiers Do We Need? Type I Errors and Power in Multiple Baseline Designs
Lanovaz, M. J., & Turgeon, S. (2020) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-020-00263-x · Cited by 34
“Among these designs, researchers have found that multiple baseline designs were the most frequently used (Coon & Rapp, 2018; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundAcceptance of Industrial Collaborative Robots by People With Disabilities in Sheltered Workshops
Drolshagen, S., Pfingsthorn, M. F., Gliesche, P., & Hein, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.541741 · Cited by 34
“Usually, the comparison takes place between different time periods, in which a collected baseline phase is compared with subsequent phases (Smith, 2012).”
ResultRichards, P., & Simpson, S. (2015) · British Journal of Guidance & Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069885.2014.936824 · Cited by 32
“Visual analysis remains the standard by which most single case experimental designs are analysed (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBusacca, M. L., Anderson, A., & Moore, D. W. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9230-3 · Cited by 33
“…growing focus on evidence-based practice along with the rising status of SCD research (Plavnick and Ferreri 2013; Shadish 2014) has resulted in numerous attempts to develop reliable, objective, and defensible standards that can be used to evaluate SCD evidence (see Maggin et al. 2014; Smith 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrogan, K. M., Falligant, J. M., & Rapp, J. T. (2017) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445517693812 · Cited by 33
“Data for both groups were primarily evaluated using visual analysis during the conduct of the study; however, a supplemental statistical analysis was also conducted using a paired-sample t test following completion of the study (Kazdin, 2011; Smith, 2012).”
MethodWhat Works Clearinghouse Standards and Generalization of Single-Case Design Evidence
Hitchcock, J. H., Kratochwill, T. R., & Chezan, L. C. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9224-1 · Cited by 32
Randomization tests for changing criterion designs
Onghena, P., Tanious, R., De, T. K., & Michiels, B. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.005 · Cited by 35
BANOVA: Bayesian Analysis of Experiments in Consumer Psychology
Wedel, M., & Chen, D. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1111 · Cited by 33
Kajimura, S., Masuda, N., Lau, J. K. L., & Murayama, K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75396-9 · Cited by 31
A Randomized Trial of User-Controlled Text Messaging to Improve Asthma Outcomes: A Pilot Study
Britto, M. T., Rohan, J. M., Dodds, C. M., & Byczkowski, T. L. (2017) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922816684857 · Cited by 32
Eriksson, K., Hartelius, L., & Saldert, C. (2016) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12216 · Cited by 31
Handling missing data in randomization tests for single-case experiments: A simulation study
De, T. K., Michiels, B., Tanious, R., & Onghena, P. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01320-3 · Cited by 31
“Missing data are common in SCEs, often due to human factors such as forgetfulness or systematic noncompliance to the protocols of data collection in an experiment (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBehavioural interventions to treat drooling in children with neurodisability: a systematic review
McInerney, M., Reddihough, D. S., Carding, P. N., Swanton, R., Walton, C., & Imms, C. (2018) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.14048 · Cited by 30
“The application of randomization is a critical component of SCEDs where threats to internal validity can be experimentally controlled and opportunities for statistical testing can be facilitated.(40) The use of randomization further enables the researcher to determine whether there is a causal or functional relationsh…”
BackgroundThe Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement
Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W. R., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., Horner, R. H., Kazdin, A. E., Kratochwill, T. R., McDonald, S., et al. (2016) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2016.1190525 · Cited by 30
Lebrun, C., Gély‐Nargeot, M., Rossignol, A., Geny, C., & Bayard, S. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22883 · Cited by 32
Moeller, J., Dattilo, J., & Rusch, F. (2015) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.21801 · Cited by 27
“Recently, studies employing single-case research methods appear to be even more prevalent (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundThe Effectiveness of Intensive Interaction, A Systematic Literature Review.
Hutchinson, N., & Bodicoat, A. (2015) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.12138 · Cited by 30
“For single case designs, referring to guidance such as Tate et al. (2008) and Smith (2012) will add to the quality and strength of research evidence.”
BackgroundMethodBenelli, E., CARLO, A. D., Biffi, D., & McLeod, J. (2015) · Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) · doi:10.4473/tpm22.1.7 · Cited by 29
“timethod and multisource evaluation of outcome (Smith, 2012), such as HSCED.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssistive Technology for Adults on the Autism Spectrum: A Systematic Survey
Wang, M., & Jeon, M. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2163568 · Cited by 34
“SCEDs, also referred to as within-subject designs (Ma, 2011), were primarily used to examine the effectiveness of interventions (Krasny-Pacini & Evans, 2018; Smith, 2012).”
MethodTherapeutic Assessment of Complex Trauma
Tarocchi, A., Aschieri, F., Fantini, F., & Smith, J. D. (2013) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/1534650113479442 · Cited by 28
“Experimental single-case designs with repeated measurement (e.g., a time-series) are a valuable tool to investigate the effects of therapeutic interventions (e.g., Borckardt et al., 2008) and have been used extensively over the past decade (Smith, 2012).”
Self-citationResearch Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Designs
Pustejovsky, J. E., & Ferron, J. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315517698.ch12 · Cited by 28
“More relevant to special education, scholars have used research synthesis methods to evaluate the methodological characteristics of published SCDs against existing standards and bestpractice recommendations (Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012) and to examine the extent to which data from SCDs meet the assumptions r…”
BackgroundMethodKilleen, P. R. (2018) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-018-0171-8 · Cited by 29
“Research strategies are evolving for such single-case experimental designs (e.g., Barlow & Hayes, 1979; Barlow, Nock, & Hersen, 2008; Smith, 2012), but, with interesting exceptions (e.g., Tryon, 1982; Unicomb, Colyvas, Harrison, & Hewat, 2015) statistical analysis of them lags (Shadish, Rindskopf,…”
BackgroundImplementing Dynamic Assessments in Psychotherapy
Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Luo, X., Bernard, N. K., Lin, Y., & Levendosky, A. A. (2016) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191116649658 · Cited by 29
“What is typically missing from this research is a careful consideration of specific factors unique to a particular patient, clinician, or dyad that may explain differential responses to treatments (Os, Delespaul, Wigman, Myin-Germeys, & Wichers, 2013; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundSingle-Case Data Analysis: A Practitioner Guide for Accurate and Reliable Decisions
Ninci, J. (2019) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445519867054 · Cited by 27
“The evaluation of single-case graphs using visual analysis is widely used and accepted (Kennedy, 2005; Ledford & Gast, 2018; Smith, 2012; WWC, 2017).”
MethodDevelopments in evidence creation for treatments of inborn errors of metabolism
Stöckler‐Ipsiroglu, S., Potter, B. K., Yuskiv, N., Tingley, K., Patterson, M. C., & van Karnebeek, C. (2020) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1002/jimd.12315 · Cited by 28
Babb, S., McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Caron, J. G. (2021) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2021_lshss-21-00016 · Cited by 28
Rohan, J. M., Drotar, D., Perry, A. R., McDowell, K. M., Malkin, J., & Kercsmar, C. M. (2013) · Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1037/cpp0000036 · Cited by 27
“…of the previous studies used time series statistical analyses to examine intervention effects over time, which has the advantage of evaluating effectiveness across phases of treatment and enhances interpretation of findings compared to visual inspection alone (Borckardt et al., 2008; Smith, 2012).”
Novotny, M. A., Sharp, K. J., Rapp, J. T., Jelinski, J. D., Lood, E. A., Steffes, A. K., & Ma, M. (2014) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.04.009 · Cited by 26
Durosini, I., Tarocchi, A., & Aschieri, F. (2017) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/1534650117693942 · Cited by 26
“Systematic collection of individualized data can reveal the course (trajectory) and level of change over time (Borckardt et al., 2008; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundTanious, R., De, T. K., & Onghena, P. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103414 · Cited by 30
Improving Cognitive Visual-Motor Abilities in Individuals with Down Syndrome
Torres-Carrión, P., González, C. S. G., Toledo, P., Muñoz, V., Gil, R., Reyes-Alonso, N., & Hernández-Morales, S. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19183984 · Cited by 26
“SCED can also be used to evaluate rehabilitation efficacy [53].”
BackgroundIsaksson, M., Ghaderi, A., Ramklint, M., & Wolf‐Arehult, M. (2021) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2021.101637 · Cited by 26
Hasselman, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.859127 · Cited by 27
“…during a short, but very intensive, measurement period, for example, one or 2 weeks in which a participant is prompted 10 or more times per day to provide self-reports of activities, emotional, psychological or physiological states (Trull and Ebner-Priemer, 2009; Smith, 2012; Liao et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMcFadden, T., Fortier, M., & Guérin, E. (2017) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.01.002 · Cited by 32
Dealing with missing data by EM in single-case studies
Chen, L., Feng, Y., Wu, P.-J., & Peng, C. J. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01210-8 · Cited by 27
“Effect size SCED studies play an important role in establishing and confirming evidence-based interventions (Horner et al., 2005; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUsing dual‐criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: Replication and extension
Falligant, J. M., McNulty, M. K., Hausman, N. L., & Rooker, G. W. (2019) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.665 · Cited by 25
Ledford, J. R., Barton, E. E., Severini, K. E., Zimmerman, K. N., & Pokorski, E. A. (2019) · Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416471905400402 · Cited by 25
“Several previous studies have evaluated the extent to which different designs are used in behavioral and special education journals (Hammond & Gast, 2010) and in education and psychology research (Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012).”
Somer, E., Gische, C., & Miočević, M. (2022) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/01632787211071136 · Cited by 27
“SCEDs are used across various research fields, including occupational therapy, special education, and rehabilitation (Lane et al., 2017; Ritter et al., 2018; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMartínez‐Huertas, J. Á., Olmos, R., & Ferrer, E. E. (2021) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2021.1889946 · Cited by 30
“Among the many possibilities, one interesting experimental design to explore is the single-case experimental designs (e.g., Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundBenchmarking effect sizes in single-case experimental designs
Vannest, K. J., & Sallese, M. R. (2021) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2021.1886412 · Cited by 31
“to the literature-base related to reporting characteristics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving SCED studies (Beretvas & Chung, 2008; Jamshidi et al., 2017; Schlosser et al., 2008; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodResultGraham, C. D., O'Hara, D. J., & Kemp, S. (2018) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2174 · Cited by 24
“However, as we did not use an xperimental design we could not exclude further threats to the validity of our findings (e.g. regression to mean, placebo etc.; Smith, 2012).”
MethodAssessing Nonoverlap in Single-Case Data: Strengths, Challenges, and Recommendations
Manolov, R., & Tanious, R. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-024-09552-w · Cited by 24
“…(i.e., multiple-baseline, withdrawal/reversal, and changing criterion designs), the first of which are the most commonly used SCEDs, according to several reviews of published literature (Pustejovsky, Swan, & English, 2023a, 2023b; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012; Tanious & Onghena, 2021).”
Hronis, A., Roberts, R., Roberts, L., & Kneebone, I. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22741 · Cited by 24
Assessing Consistency in Single-Case A-B-A-B Phase Designs
Tanious, R., De, T. K., Michiels, B., Noortgate, W. V. D., & Onghena, P. (2019) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445519837726 · Cited by 28
“The What Works Clearinghouse guidelines for SCEDs (Kratochwill et al., 2010) recommend inspecting six features of the data when performing visual analysis: level, trend, variability, immediacy of the effect, overlap, and CONsistency of DAta Patterns (CONDAP) across similar phases.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHolcomb, L., & Wolbers, K. A. (2020) · Children · doi:10.3390/children7120256 · Cited by 24
“Based on several meta-analyses, approximately 10% of overall single subject research used alternating treatments design (Hammond & Gast, 2010; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012).”
MethodCortina, S., Somers, M., Rohan, J. M., & Drotar, D. (2013) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jss175 · Cited by 24
“…interventions, as they are delivered in clinical practice (Borckardt et al., 2008), case by case individual differences in treatment responsiveness (Howard, Moras, Brill, Martinovich, & Lutz, 1996), and the efficacy of single case experimental designs on treatment adherence (Smith, 2012).”
Computing Tools for Implementing Standards for Single-Case Designs
Chen, L.-T., Peng, C., & Chen, M. (2015) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445515603706 · Cited by 25
“The second set of standards is concerned with measurement and assessment of the outcome behavior (Kratochwill & Levin, 2014; Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialFilho, H. B. N., Neto, M. B. D. C., Taytelbaum, G. P. T., Malheiros, R. S., & Knaus, Y. C. (2016) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1022-1 · Cited by 30
Murray, H. B., Juarascio, A. S., & Thomas, J. J. (2020) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.12.001 · Cited by 23
Extrapolating baseline trend in single-case data: Problems and tentative solutions
Manolov, R., Solanas, A., & Sierra, V. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1165-x · Cited by 23
Kessler, D., Anderson, N. D., & DAWSON, D. R. (2021) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/0308022620988471 · Cited by 23
“SCED is a rigorous method for developing evidence of the efficacy of an intervention by using participants as their own controls via repeated measures (Smith, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodAnalytical Options for Single-Case Experimental Designs: Review and Application to Brain Impairment
Manolov, R., & Solanas, A. (2017) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1017/brimp.2017.17 · Cited by 23
“Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are strategies capable of meeting criteria for experimental quality (Smith, 2012) and useful for identifying evidence-based practices (Schlosser, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSingle-Case Experimental Designs
Kratochwill, T., Mission, P., & Hagermoser, E. M. (2015) · The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp304
Keyes, A., Deale, A. C., Foster, C., & Veale, D. M. (2019) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101523 · Cited by 24
Osos, J. A., Plavnick, J. B., & Avendaño, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04784-x · Cited by 22
“Though single case experimental research designs allow for flexibility of implementing and analyzing intervention research (Smith 2012), a larger sample size would be needed to extend the findings to a larger population of students.”
BackgroundGupta, S., & Dhawan, A. (2022) · Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jaim.2022.100620 · Cited by 26
“Meditation and yoga (de fi ned as a combination of meditation and its context) [1], have gained popularity in contemporary sci-enti fi c research and have been used for several mental health (stress, anxiety, depressive disorders, etc.) [2,3] and physical conditions (pain, etc.) [4,5].”
Taylor, S. A., Ortega, J. V., & Anderson, R. (2019) · Speech Language and Hearing · doi:10.1080/2050571x.2019.1684068 · Cited by 22
“We included single-subject studies if the authors reported at least three replications of treatment effects (e.g., ABAB, or multiple baseline designs, see Smith, 2012 for descriptions).”
MethodHandling missing data in single-case studies
Peng, C.-Y. J., & Chen, L.-T. (2018) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1525133280 · Cited by 22
“Because the importance of SCED research in establishing and confirming evidence-based practices has been increasingly affirmed (Horner et al., 2005; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012), it is imperative that SCED research be conducted at the highest level of rigor to yield credible and generalizable results.”
BackgroundInfluentialAssessing Intervention Effects in the Presence of Missing Scores
Peng, C.-Y. J., & Chen, L.-T. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11020076 · Cited by 21
“Sci. 2021, 11, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020076 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education In a review of SCD standards and 409 empirical studies published in refereed journals between 2000 and 2010, Smith [11] lamented, “SCDs undeniably present researchers with a complex array of methodological and research de…”
BackgroundInfluential“Is Our Daughter Crazy or Bad?”: A Case Study of Therapeutic Assessment with Children
Fantini, F., Aschieri, F., & Bertrando, P. (2013) · Contemporary Family Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10591-013-9265-3 · Cited by 22
“…has focused on the effectiveness of TA with different types of problems, i.e., self-harm (Ougrin et al. 2008); internalizing symptoms, (Aschieri and Smith 2012); externalizing symptoms (Smith et al. 2010); disorganized attachment (Smith and George 2012); and developmental trauma (Tarocchi et al.…”
BackgroundMethodEiring, Ø., Nytrøen, K., Kienlin, S. M., Khodambashi, S., & Nylenna, M. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0481-x · Cited by 21
“More than 400 studies have been conducted using SSRDs [33].”
BackgroundGassaway, J. A., Jones, M. L., Sweatman, W. M., & Young, T. (2017) · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine · doi:10.1080/10790268.2017.1385992 · Cited by 21
Ridenour, T., Wittenborn, A. K., Raiff, B., Benedict, N. J., & Kane-Gill, S. (2016) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0357-5 · Cited by 20
Psychiatric neuroimaging designs for individualised, cohort, and population studies
Gell, M., Noble, S., Laumann, T. O., Nelson, S. M., & Tervo‐Clemmens, B. (2024) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-024-01918-y · Cited by 24
“…longitudinal inferences on the level of an individual participant, methodological challenges such as low statistical power for inferential statistics, and dif fi culties with interpreting single-subject effect sizes [21], often mean that generalisation to a broader population needs to be considered.”
BackgroundHow to Be RAD: Repeated Acquisition Design Features that Enhance Internal and External Validity
Kirby, M. S., Spencer, T. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2021) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-021-00301-2 · Cited by 23
“…that Strengthen Internal and/or External Validity Intervention researchers often rely on MBD and ATD to make claims about functional relationships (Ledford et al., 2019; Pustejovsky et al., 2019; Shadish & Sullivan, 2011; Smith, 2012; Tanious & Onghena, 2020) even when RAD might be suitable.”
BackgroundSingle-Case Experimental Designs: Clinical Research and Practice
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Onghena, P., Vannest, K. J., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818697-8.00191-6 · Cited by 22
Luna, O., Rapp, J. T., & Brogan, K. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-022-00325-2 · Cited by 20
“Unlike traditional single-case experimental designs (Smith, 2012), ABA team members intervened on dormitory staff members as a group. In particular, each staff member’s praise statements, reprimands, and instructions contributed to the total occurrence of behaviors within an observation. In particular, we recorded pra…”
BackgroundEstablishing Interventions via a Theory-Driven Single Case Design Research Cycle
Kilgus, S. P., Riley‐Tillman, T. C., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2016) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.17105/spr45-4.477-498 · Cited by 23
“Multiple researchers have recently compared these standards (e.g., Maggin et al., 2014; Smith, 2012; Wendt & Miller, 2012).”
BackgroundInformal versus formal judgment of statistical models: The case of normality assumptions
Bishara, A. J., Li, J., & Conley, C. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01879-z · Cited by 30
“Perhaps because of these findings, in single-subject designs, the focus has been shifting toward more formal statistical analyses (Fisch, 2001; Manolov, Gast, Perdices, & Evans, 2014; Smith, 2012), or at the very least toward formal quantifications of visual depictions (Lane & Gast, 2014).”
BackgroundCloutier, B., Lecomte, T., Diotte, F., Lamontagne, J., Abdel‐Baki, A., Daneault, J.-G., Rabbath, M. E. G., de Connor, A., & Perrine, C. (2023) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/01454455231186586 · Cited by 20
“, replication of effects across a minimum of three conditions), which was demonstrated in the current study (Smith, 2012).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBaldi, S., Nunzi, M., & Brina, C. D. (2015) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/10.15.pms.120v15x5 · Cited by 19
“The data collection and analysis were conducted using a single-case ABA design ( Kazdin, 1982 ), chosen for its fl exibility and applicability, and have been used extensively over the past decade ( Smith, 2012 ).”
MethodN-of-1 Trials in the Behavioral Sciences
Tate, R., & Perdices, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7200-6_3 · Cited by 14
Huber, A., Oppikofer, S., Meister, L., Langensteiner, F., Meier, N., & Seifert, A. (2020) · Activities Adaptation & Aging · doi:10.1080/01924788.2020.1722348 · Cited by 19
“As described in the methodical review of Smith (2013) and applied in the study of Kwak et al. (2018), both groups received the intervention and the treatment-as-usual control condition.”
BackgroundMethodChawla, U., Verma, B., & Mittal, A. (2024) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-09-2023-0104 · Cited by 18
Smith, J. D., Fu, E. S., Rado, J. T., Rosenthal, L. J., Carroll, A. J., Atlas, J. A., Carlo, A. D., Burnett‐Zeigler, I., Jordan, N., Brown, C. H., et al. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100823 · Cited by 18
“ically using an interrupted time-series-type analysis to determine the impact [91].”
MethodSelf-citationAydın, O., & Tanious, R. (2022) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.928 · Cited by 18
Assessing Functional Relations in Single-Case Designs
Manolov, R., Sierra, V., Solanas, A., & Botella, J. (2014) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445514545679 · Cited by 18
“Despite the existence of visual aids and randomization procedures and tests (Kratochwill & Levin, 2010), we consider that, in case either of the procedures proves to perform well, such a procedure would be potentially useful given that (a) they are not only visual aids but also offer quantifications that can later be…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Justin D.
- ORCID
- Smith, Justin D.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-550
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- PMC
- PMC3652808
- OpenAlex
- W1978096047
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 648
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH20012)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- single-case experimental design, study design quality, methodological standards, visual analysis, statistical analysis methods, methodological quality
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Design, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review