Cited by 29Cognitive Abilities and TestingSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotional Intelligence and Performance

Group differences in IQ are best understood as environmental in origin.

Nisbett, Richard E., Aronson, Joshua, Blair, Clancy, Dickens, William, Flynn, James, Halpern, Diane F., Turkheimer, Eric·2012·American Psychologist

Abstract

Responds to the comments by J. P. Rushton (see record 2012-24333-012); M. A. Woodley and G. Meisenberg (see record 2012-24333-013); and J. D. Mayer, D. R. Caruso, A. T. Panter, and P. Salovey (see record 2012-24333-014) on the present authors' original article, "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments" (see record 2011-30298-001). Here, the authors address the concerns raised by Rushton and by Woodley and Meisenberg, and conclude by agreeing with Mayer et al's claim that many types of abilities can be thought of as intelligence of a kind. They note, however, that it has proved hard to show that measures of emotional intelligence or social intelligence contribute to behavior we would want to call intelligent over and above their correlation with conventional IQ tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029772

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Claremont McKenna College (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2012
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
503-504
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2049690409
Cited by
29
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Keywords
intelligence, heritability of intelligence, emotional intelligence, social intelligence, intelligence testing
MeSH terms
Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review