The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon.
Open accessAbstract
The five-factor model (FFM) of personality variation has been replicated across a range of human societies, suggesting the FFM is a human universal. However, most studies of the FFM have been restricted to literate, urban populations, which are uncharacteristic of the majority of human evolutionary history. We present the first test of the FFM in a largely illiterate, indigenous society. Tsimane forager-horticulturalist men and women of Bolivia (n = 632) completed a translation of the 44-item Big Five Inventory (Benet-Martínez & John, 1998), a widely used metric of the FFM. We failed to find robust support for the FFM, based on tests of (a) internal consistency of items expected to segregate into the Big Five factors, (b) response stability of the Big Five, (c) external validity of the Big Five with respect to observed behavior, (d) factor structure according to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and (e) similarity with a U.S. target structure based on Procrustes rotation analysis. Replication of the FFM was not improved in a separate sample of Tsimane adults (n = 430), who evaluated their spouses on the Big Five Inventory. Removal of reverse-scored items that may have elicited response biases produced factors suggestive of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, but fit to the FFM remained poor. Response styles may covary with exposure to education, but we found no better fit to the FFM among Tsimane who speak Spanish or have attended school. We argue that Tsimane personality variation displays 2 principal factors that may reflect socioecological characteristics common to small-scale societies. We offer evolutionary perspectives on why the structure of personality variation may not be invariant across human societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, although others have not found as overt problems (see ref. 15), the Big Five structure has replicated poorly when lexical analyses are conducted in diverse languages (16) and in several small-scale societies (17–19).”
From Simpson’s gender-equality paradox (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Personality Structure: Emergence Of The 5-Factor Model
Digman, J. M. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · Cited by 6,731
An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216 · Cited by 6,652
Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research
Pervin, L. A. (1992) · Cited by 4,543
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509 · Cited by 4,234
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,345
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729 · Cited by 1,996
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 · Cited by 1,961 · cited 2×
“…emerge everywhere, and some researchers have posited more than five personality factors within certain populations (e.g., Cheung & Leung, 1998; Lee & Ashton, 2004); however, these additional factors can often be subsumed under one of the Big Five factors (Guanzon-Lapeña, Church, Carlota, &…”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Cancian F Plattner S Economic behavior in peasant communities Economic anthropology 1989 127 170 Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
- Cashdan E Cashdan E Introduction Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant societies 1990 1 16 Boulder, CO Westview Press
- Chicchon A Chimane resource use and market involvement in the Beni Biosphere Reserve 1992 Gainesville, Florida University of Florida Unpublished doctoral dissertation
- Lee K Ashton MC The HEXACO Personality Inventory: A new measure of the major dimensions of personality Multivariate Behavioral Research 2004 39 329 358 26804579
- Sih A Bell AM Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes Advances in the Study of Behavior 2008 38 227 281 24991063 PMC4075144
- Sih A Bell AM Johnson JC Ziemba RE Behavioural syndromes: An integrative overview Quarterly Review of Biology 2004 79 241 277 15529965
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–415 of 415
A Change is Gonna Come: Universality, Stability, and Shocks in Personality Traits in Rural India
Natal, A., & Nordman, C. J. (2025) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2025.2577312
van de Pas, N., Bagheri, A., & Sier, W. (2026) · Personality Science · doi:10.1177/27000710261431090
Yamada, S. (2026) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7968-6_4
Bien-être chez les personnes âgées : une étude interculturelle : Gabon-France
Indoumou-Peppe, C. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5bf5ed61zc5ccz46fcz8ffaza7f6aa10ee90
Skills in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Atallah, M. A. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a9579b55za5c3z412ez9245zb3ce964b3c7e
Karl, J., & Fischer, R. (2026) · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences · doi:10.5964/miss.16869 · Cited by 1
Openness to Experience: from ecology to culture
Dubourg, E., Jach, H. K., Beuchot, T., Smillie, L. D., & Baumard, N. (2026) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2026.03.006
Die Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie im Jahr 2025
Rauthmann, J. F., Armbruster, D., Asselmann, E., Berkessel, J. B., Bleidorn, W., Buecker, S., Gärtner, A., Leising, D., Luhmann, M., Phan, L. V., et al. (2026) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000737
ValueLex: Revealing the Value Structures of Large Language Models
Biedma, P., Yi, X., Huang, L. T.-L., Sun, M., & Xie, X. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-9877-9_6
Potential Determinant of Early Childhood Personality Structures in Career Development
Acar, T. O. (2026) · Journal of Employment Counseling · doi:10.1002/joec.70021
A Survey and Computational Atlas of Personality Models
Raetano, J., Gregor, J., & Tamang, S. R. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3828667 · Cited by 1
Carving Stories at their Natural JointsPreprint
Dubourg, E., Thouzeau, V., Beuchot, T., Bonard, C., Boyer, P., Chevallier, C., Clasen, M., Boon-Falleur, M., Fiorio, G., Fitouchi, L., et al. (2026) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/me6bz_v2
Yang, S., Sun, Z., Jin, A., Zhao, X., Xie, Y., & Li, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1876102
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 354-370
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- PMC
- PMC4104167
- OpenAlex
- W2114201863
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (2R01AG024119, 2R56AG024119-06)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- Big Five personality model, Tsimane, forager-horticulturalists, indigenous peoples, factor structure, response styles, small-scale societies
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Agriculture, Bolivia, Educational Status, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Rural Population, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Population Groups, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review