Cited by 1,961Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory

Lee, Kibeom, Ashton, Michael C.·2004·Multivariate Behavioral Research

Abstract

We introduce a personality inventory designed to measure six major dimensions of personality derived from lexical studies of personality structure. The HEXACO Personality Inventory (HEXACO-PI) consists of 24 facet-level personality trait scales that define the six personality factors named Honesty-Humility (H), Emotionality (E), Extraversion (X), Agreeableness (A), Conscientiousness (C), and Openness to Experience (O). In this validation study involving a sample of over 400 respondents, all HEXACO-PI scales showed high internal consistency reliabilities, conformed to the hypothesized six-factor structure, and showed adequate convergent validities with external variables. The HEXACO factor space, and the rotations of factors within that space, are discussed with reference to J. S. Wiggins' work on the circumplex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The Radex. In P. R. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  2. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C. & Shin, K.H. (in press). Personality correlates of workplace antisocial behavior. Applied psychology: An international review.
  4. 10.1037//0022-3514.59.4.781 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Brock University (CA)
Venue
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
2004-04
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
329-358
ISSN
  • 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7906
OpenAlex
W2029342244
Cited by
1,961
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 143 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 60
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multivariate Behavioral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
HEXACO personality, personality structure, honesty-humility, emotionality, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness to experience, factor structure, psychometric validation, circumplex model, personality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review