The DOI matches its Crossref record; 158 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The neuroaesthetics of music.
Abstract
The increasingly intensive study of music by neuroscientists over the past two decades has established the neurosciences of music as a subdiscipline of cognitive neuroscience, responsible for investigating the neural basis for music perception, cognition, and emotion. In this endeavor, music perception and cognition have often been compared with language processing and understanding, while music-induced emotions are compared with emotions induced by visual stimuli. Here, we review research that is beginning to define a new field of study called neuroaesthetics of music. According to this fresh perspective, music is viewed primarily as an expressive art rather than as a cognitive domain. The goal of this emerging field is to understand the neural mechanisms and structures involved in the perceptual, affective and cognitive processes that generate the three principal aesthetic responses: emotions, judgments, and preference. Although much is known about the frontotemporal brain mechanisms underlying perceptual and cognitive musical processes, and about the limbic and paralimbic networks responsible for musical affect, there is a great deal of work to be done in understanding the neural chronometry and structures determining aesthetic responses to music. Research has only recently begun to delineate the modulatory effects of the listener, listening situation, and the properties of the music itself on a musical aesthetic experience. This article offers a review and synthesis of our current understanding of the perceptual, cognitive, and affective processes involved in an aesthetic musical experience and introduces a novel framework to coordinate future endeavors in an emerging field. © 2013 American Psychological Association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113 · cited 1×
“The most widely known dimensional model of emotion is the circumplex model (e.g., Russell, 1980, 2003), which distinguishes valence (pleasure-displeasure) and arousal (activating-relaxing) as two orthogonal dimensions of an emotional experience.”
BackgroundThe somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex
Damasio, A. R. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125 · Cited by 2,847 · cited 1×
“Ventromedial prefrontal cortex is thought to be crucial for judgmental processes based on affective valence of stimuli such as in aesthetic context (Damasio, 1996; Kringelbach, 2005).”
BackgroundBlood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191355898 · Cited by 2,814
The Egyptian Labor Market in an Era of Revolution
Assaad, R. A., & Krafft, C. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.1093/acprof · Cited by 2,442
The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience
Kringelbach, M. L. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1747 · Cited by 2,180
A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea
Raichle, M. E., & Snyder, A. Z. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041 · Cited by 2,173
A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/0007126042369811 · Cited by 1,968
Cited by
Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience
Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615621274 · Cited by 258
Self-citationRhythmic entrainment as a musical affect induction mechanism
J. Trost, W., Labbé, C., & Grandjean, D. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.004 · Cited by 209
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Brattico, E., & Pearce, M.
- Venue
- Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-61
- ISSN
- 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2321658377
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 158
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neuroaesthetics of music. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0031624
- The paper
- Brattico, E., & Pearce, M. (2013). The neuroaesthetics of music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.