The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes
Abstract
Adaptive learning technologies are emerging in educational settings as a means to customize instruction to learners’ background, experiences, and prior knowledge. Here, a technology-based personalization intervention within an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) for secondary mathematics was used to adapt instruction to students’ personal interests. We conducted a learning experiment where 145 ninth-grade Algebra I students were randomly assigned to 2 conditions in the Cognitive Tutor Algebra ITS. For 1 instructional unit, half of the students received normal algebra story problems, and half received matched problems personalized to their out-of-school interests in areas such as sports, music, and movies. Results showed that students in the personalization condition solved problems faster and more accurately within the modified unit. The impact of personalization was most pronounced for 1 skill in particular—writing symbolic equations from story scenarios—and for 1 group of students in particular—students who were struggling to learn within the tutoring environment. Once the treatment had been removed, students who had received personalization continued to write symbolic equations for normal story problems with increasingly complex structures more accurately and with greater efficiency. Thus, we provide evidence that interest-based interventions can promote robust learning outcomes—such as transfer and accelerated future learning—in secondary mathematics. These interest-based connections may allow for abstract ideas to become perceptually grounded in students’ experiences such that they become easier to grasp. Adaptive learning technologies that utilize interest may be a powerful way to support learners in gaining fluency with abstract representational systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, problem-solving time and accuracy have been found to increase because of learning materials matched to student interests [200].”
From Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [200]
In the citing paper
“As every student is unique, personalizing instruction and teaching content can positively impact the learning outcome of the student (Walkington, 2013)—tutoring systems that incorporate this can be categorized as personalized learning systems or personalized tutoring aids.”
From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Walkington, 2013
Citations
Cites
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,534
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702
Clark, R. C., Mayer, R. E., & Thalheimer, W. (2003) · Performance Improvement Journal · doi:10.1002/pfi.4930420510 · Cited by 2,257
Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070002151 · Cited by 1,689
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715 · Cited by 1,568
Interest, Learning, and Motivation
Schiefele, U. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136 · Cited by 1,453
Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning
Hidi, S. E. (1990) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543060004549 · Cited by 1,407
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732216655542 · Cited by 695
“As Figure 1 summarizes, these interventions target motivational processes expected to influence critical educational outcomes, and take the learner’s phase of interest development into account.”
BackgroundBernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8 · Cited by 618
“…indicate a design choice that benefitted students ’ motivation (Bernacki & Walkington, 2018, date 1) and performance (Bernacki & Walkington, 2018; Walkington, 2013; Walkington & Bernacki, 2019, date 1, 2) such programs will often include multiple components in order to satisfy program…”
BackgroundHwang, G., & Tu, Y. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9060584 · Cited by 558
“Moreover, the number of individual applications generally increased, and the application domains became more diverse from the first to the third time periods.”
BackgroundDifferentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms‐Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366 · Cited by 560
“Some recent studies on adaptive or personalized ICT programs, digital pen technologies, and blended learning show that such interventions can support differentiated instruction and have positive effects on student achievement (Walkington, 2013; Chen et al., 2016; Van Halem et al., 2017; Ghysels and Haelermans, 2018),…”
BackgroundAlamri, H., Lowell, V. L., Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2020) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449 · Cited by 377
“Learner Needs and Interests – PL course design (Barr & Tagg, 1995; Bernacki & Walkington, 2018; Walkington, 2013; Watson & Watson, 2017) – Inclusion of all possible pathways/tracks within the course objectives and parameters (Barr & Tagg, 1995; Bernacki & Walkington, 2018; Walkington, 2013; Watson & Watson, 2017) – In…”
BackgroundInfluentialdu Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630 · Cited by 567
“Several studies have found that adapting instruction to student interests and providing personalized motivation, can enhance engagement and performance [148,149].”
BackgroundHalkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13183762 · Cited by 328
“Tailoring content to student interests and experiences “grounds” abstract concepts and increases the speed and accuracy of problem-solving [200].”
InfluentialWalkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1747757 · Cited by 377
“It could be defined as leveraging students’ interests through automatic adaptivity (e.g., Walkington, 2013), or learner-driven content creation (e.g., Garrett et al., this issue), or strengths-based learning (McCarthy & Liu, this issue).”
BackgroundVistorte, A. O. R., Deroncele-Acosta, Á., Ayala, J. L. M., Barrasa, Á., López-Granero, C., & Martí-González, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089 · Cited by 412
“Adaptive learning technologies, which tailor instruction to align with students’ personal interests, have demonstrated the potential to enhance performance and learning outcomes (Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the implementation of personalized learning: A research synthesis
Ling, Z., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100339 · Cited by 317
Developing Personalized Education: A Dynamic Framework
Tetzlaff, L., Schmiedek, F., & Brod, G. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09570-w · Cited by 321
“…have been successfully adapted to, over and above prior knowledge, include metacognitive skills (Azevedo et al. 2009), current affect (D ’ Mello et al. 2012; Lehman et al. 2013), and motivation (Walkington 2013; for a comprehensive overview of different adaptations in ITS see Aleven et al. 2017).”
BackgroundMartin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L., & Westine, C. D. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2 · Cited by 306
“These studies examined students’ learning behavior such as comparing student thinking styles with their behavior, using web log mining to capture learner behavior, examining learning styles in an adaptive game, comparing student characteristics and their learning paths, and classifying students based on learning style…”
BackgroundMaking Learning Personally Meaningful: A New Framework for Relevance Research
Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1380589 · Cited by 229
“It can take a number of forms, such as individualized instruction materials (e.g., Høgheim & Reber, 2015; Walkington, 2013) or allowing students to choose among a range of instruction materials (e.g., Palmer, 2009; Patall, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRelevance for Learning and Motivation in Education
Albrecht, J. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1380593 · Cited by 250
“Like direct communication, personalization tailors curricular activities to students’ background knowledge and interests, typically through instructional technologies that give students the opportunity to indicate which topics they find interesting and presumably relevant (Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundEffects of Technology in Mathematics on Achievement, Motivation, and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis
Higgins, K. N., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J. N., & Crawford, L. (2017) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117748416 · Cited by 259
At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts
Bronkhorst, L. H., & Akkerman, S. F. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.001 · Cited by 185
“…representing students' interests in class, for instance, with using rap lyrics (Hallman, 2009; Heron-Hruby et al. 2008; Polman, 2006), new media, or online technology (Hung, Lee, & Lim, 2012; Walsh, 2007) or by personalizing instruction to match students' interests all together (Walkington, 2013).”
Matthews, J. S. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000242 · Cited by 152
Investigating the effect of an adaptive learning intervention on students’ learning
Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Corliss, S. B., & Carrigan, J. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9542-1 · Cited by 138
The role of cost in adolescent students' maladaptive academic outcomes
Jiang, Y., Kim, S., & Bong, M. (2020) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2020.08.004 · Cited by 159
Sarıtepeci, M., & Durak, H. Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12829-2 · Cited by 198
“Indeed, Walkington (2013) noted that personalized learning experience provides more positive and robust learning outcomes.”
Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review
Mallik, S., & Gangopadhyay, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1151391 · Cited by 139
“impact the learning outcome of the student (Walkington, 2013)— tutoring systems that incorporate this can be categorized as personalized learning systems or personalized tutoring aids.”
BackgroundWalkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2014) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320140000018004 · Cited by 118
Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2015) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.006 · Cited by 109
The Educational Benefits of Self-Related Information Processing
Hidi, S. E., Renninger, K. A., & Northoff, G. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823279.003 · Cited by 107
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-018-0168-1 · Cited by 111
“Contrast this with the following video game problem used in an intelligent tutoring system intervention reported in Walkington (2013): BYou work at a store that sells computers and electronics.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBelenky, D. M., & Schalk, L. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9251-9 · Cited by 96
Naznin, K., Mahmud, A. A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14020053 · Cited by 123
Implementation of technology-supported personalized learning—its impact on instructional quality
Schmid, R., Pauli, C., Стеблер, Р., Reusser, K., & Petko, D. (2022) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2022.2089086 · Cited by 91
“The majority of these studies were associated with positive findings among others in terms of academic outcome and engagement (e.g., Arroyo et al., 2014; Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundSources of self-efficacy in academic contexts: A longitudinal perspective.
Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000151 · Cited by 72
Sources of Evidence-of-Learning: Learning and assessment in the era of big data
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015) · Open Review of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/23265507.2015.1074869 · Cited by 71
“…Vojak, & Kline, 2011; DiCerbo & Behrens, 2014; Mislevy, Almond, & Lukas, 2004; Quellmalz & Pellegrino, 2009); and adaptive, personalized or differentiated instruction which calibrates learning to individual needs (Conati & Kardan, 2013; Shute & Zapata-Rivera, 2012; Walkington, 2013; Wolf, 2010).”
Brod, G., Kucirkova, N. I., Shepherd, J., Jolles, D., & Molenaar, I. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09749-x · Cited by 101
“EdTech that adapt to the user in the course of learning draw on intelligent tutoring systems or adaptive learning technologies (Walkington, 2013) to automate the interaction between the learner and the digital content (Aleven et al. 2016).”
BackgroundWalkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2015) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.001 · Cited by 64
Implementation of Adaptive Learning Systems: Current State and Potential
Imhof, C., Bergamin, P. B., & McGarrity, S. (2020) · Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48190-2_6 · Cited by 68
Kokka, K. (2018) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085918806947 · Cited by 62
“In addition, using tasks set in real-world contexts may improve mathematics performance (Bottge & Hasselbring, 1993; Carraher, Carraher, & Schliemann, 1985) and engagement (Bae & Kokka, 2016), especially if the tasks are aligned with students’ interests (Walkington, 2013).”
MethodThe Educational Value of Artificial Intelligence and Social Robots
Λαμπρόπουλος, Γ., & Papadakis, S. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82915-4_1 · Cited by 83
Personalization of Instruction: Design Dimensions and Implications for Cognition
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1380590 · Cited by 70
“Results (Bernacki & Walkington, under review) replicated and extended the findings from Walkington (2013): Students receiving personalization reported higher interest, showed greater learning efficiency and had higher performance on paperbased classroom exams than the control group.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMotivational strategies to engage learners in desirable difficulties.
Zepeda, C. D., Martin, R. S., & Butler, A. C. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.007 · Cited by 58
Supporting children's math learning with feedback-augmented narrative technology
Ruan, S., He, J., Ying, R., Burkle, J., Hakim, D., Wang, A., Yin, Y., Zhou, L., Xu, Q., AbuHashem, A. A., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/3392063.3394400 · Cited by 59
“We also personalize the narrative in several ways, given personalized instruction and fantasy play can boost engagement and learning [6, 73].”
Walkington, C., Petrosino, A. J., & Sherman, M. F. (2013) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2013.770717 · Cited by 62
Pandiangan, P., Sanjaya, I. G. M., & Jatmiko, B. (2017) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/17.16.651 · Cited by 57
Opportunities and challenges of using generative AI to personalize educational assessment
Arslan, B., Lehman, B., Tenison, C., Sparks, J. R., López, A. A., Gu, L., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1460651 · Cited by 52
“Context personalization can significantly enhance learner motivation and engagement by allowing learners to bring their cultural identity to the learning environment, leading to better learning outcomes (Walkington, 2013; Walkington and Bernacki, 2018, 2019).”
BackgroundAn Interview Reflection on “Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City”
Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2015) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0082-8 · Cited by 51
Who Benefits from Diagrams and Illustrations in Math Problems? Ability and Attitudes Matter
Cooper, J., Sidney, P. G., & Alibali, M. W. (2017) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3371 · Cited by 63
“It is worth noting that some research has shown greater benefits of contextual information for students with lower math ability on harder problems (Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, S., Guo, X., Hu, X., & Zhao, X. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13244876 · Cited by 58
Walkington, C., Clinton‐Lisell, V., & Shivraj, P. (2017) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831217737028 · Cited by 60
Exploring the influence of ChatGPT on student academic success and career readiness
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13148-2 · Cited by 69
“Students with specific knowledge gaps can use ChatGPT for targeted instruction and practice activities, similar to the effectiveness of AI-powered tutors found by (Corry & Carlson-Bancroft, 2014; Walkington, 2013).”
Application of ChatGPT for automated problem reframing across academic domains
Einarsson, H., Lund, S. H., & Jónsdóttir, A. H. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100194 · Cited by 59
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., & Demir, İ. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3554222 · Cited by 74
“For instance, a study involving ninth-grade Algebra I students demonstrated that personalized problems aligned with students’ interests in sports, music, and movies led to faster and more accurate problem-solving, particularly benefiting those struggling within the tutoring environment [44].”
Designing personalised instruction: A research and design framework
Kucirkova, N. I., Gerard, L. F., & Linn, M. C. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13119 · Cited by 51
“Many hope that this challenge will benefit from data-based technologies (eg, Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundWalkington, C., Clinton‐Lisell, V., & Sparks, A. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09481-6 · Cited by 45
Adaptive Learning Technology Relationship with Student Learning Outcomes
White, G. L. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/4526 · Cited by 41
Hyde, J. S., Canning, E. A., Rozek, C. S., Clarke‐Rubright, E. K., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12253 · Cited by 40
“Related research in mathematics education has established the effectiveness of personalization in fostering students’ learning (Cordova & Lepper, 1996; Walkington, 2013; Walkington, Petrosino, & Sherman, 2013).”
BackgroundWalkington, C., Clinton‐Lisell, V., RITTER, S., & Nathan, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000036 · Cited by 42
“However, the result that familiar contexts or topics are associated with higher performance on algebra word problems, has been recently replicated in the context of online curricula (Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEliciting Mathematics Interest: New Directions for Context Personalization and Example Choice
Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2016.1268085 · Cited by 39
“For example, Walkington (2013) proposed that the familiar contexts provided by context personalization can help in grounding abstract mathematical concepts for learners, making content more intelligible (see also Boaler, 1994).”
BackgroundPersonalized learning and ESSA: What we know and where we go
Zhang, L., Yang, S., & Carter, R. A. (2020) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1728448 · Cited by 38
“Studies on context personalization are usually grounded in research in cognition, motivation, and emotion (see Cordova & Lepper, 1996; Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundMeasuring Learner Satisfaction of an Adaptive Learning System
Lim, L., Lim, S. H., & Lim, R. W. Y. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12080264 · Cited by 37
“With adaptive learning systems, learners could take ownership of their learning experience [9] and accelerate future learning [10].”
Background“Math word problem generation with mathematical consistency and problem context constraints,”
Wang, Z., Lan, A., & Baraniuk, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.484 · Cited by 39
“…generation method can generate MWPs tailored to each student’s background and interests, providing students with a personalized learning experience (Walkington, 2013) that often leads to better engagement and improved learning outcomes (Connor-Greene, 2000; Karpicke, 2012; Karpicke and Roediger,…”
BackgroundMethodNasrullah, A., Marlina, M., & Dwiyanti, W. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i12.8636 · Cited by 36
Guo, Y. M., Klein, B. D., & Ro, Y. K. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1593348 · Cited by 42
“More importantly, course design in which instructional materials are adapted to fit with individual student interests has been found to improve learning outcomes in the acquisition of math skills (Walkington 2013).”
BackgroundLearner differences in theory and practice†
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2016) · Open Review of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/23265507.2016.1164616 · Cited by 30
“Such is the objective of adaptive, personalized or differentiated instruction which calibrates learning to individuals (Walkington, 2013; Wolf, 2010).”
BackgroundLee, S., Lee, J., & Jeong, Y. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437221130712 · Cited by 48
“Previous studies show that education technology that encourages a self-directed, interactive, and collaborative learning environment has positive effects on students’ academic outcomes (e.g., Barrow, Markman, and Rouse 2009; Walkington 2013).”
Walkington, C., & Hayata, C. (2017) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0842-z · Cited by 43
Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12725 · Cited by 31
A one stop shop? Perspectives on the value of adaptive learning technologies in K-12 education
Divanji, R. A., Bindman, S. W., Tung, A., Chen, K., Castaneda, L. M., & Scanlon, M. (2023) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100157 · Cited by 38
“Although reliable data are not available about the prevalence of ALTs, recent research suggests that these tools are commonly used in K-12 classrooms [1 – 5].”
BackgroundValue Reappraisal as a Conceptual Model for Task-Value Interventions
Acee, T., Weinstein, C., Hoang, T. V., & Flaggs, D. A. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1381830 · Cited by 23
“Some relevance interventions have focused on modifying course content so that it is more appealing, relevant to students, and applicable to the real world (see Harackiewicz, Smith, & Priniski, 2016; Walkington, 2013; Woolley, Rose, Orthner, Akos, & Jones-Sanpei, 2013).”
BackgroundInstructional Interventions That Support Student Engagement: An International Perspective
James, N. P., Shernoff, D. J., Bressler, D. M., Larson, S. C., & Sinha, S. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813413-9.00008-5 · Cited by 36
Ellis, B. J., Abrams, L. S., Masten, A. S., Sternberg, R. J., Tottenham, N., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009350051 · Cited by 33
Adaptive learning: a cluster-based literature review (2011-2022)
Фадєєва, Л. О. (2023) · Educational Technology Quarterly · doi:10.55056/etq.613 · Cited by 27
“Walkington [196] showed that an interest-based personalization intervention within an intelligent tutoring system for secondary mathematics improved learning outcomes for struggling students.”
BackgroundABC problem in elementary mathematics education: Arithmetic before comprehension
Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2016) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-016-9350-2 · Cited by 30
“Key word strategies focus on surface features and ignore the deep structure of relationships within the question text (Sowder 1988; Walkington 2013; Parmar 1992) and are antagonistic to building the mathematical proficiency of conceptual understanding (National Research Council 2001).”
BackgroundLin, L., Lin, X., Zhang, X., & Ginns, P. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09933-7 · Cited by 48
“Moreover, due to a limited number of studies that reported information on learners’ prior knowledge, we were only able to obtain the information from four studies (i.e., Awo-fala et al., 2011; Cordova & Lepper, 1996; Ku & Sullivan, 2000; Walkington, 2013).”
Using AI for Adaptive Learning and Adaptive Assessment
Khine, M. S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9350-1_3 · Cited by 39
Kim, J. S., Asher, C. A., Burkhauser, M., Mesite, L. M., & Leyva, D. (2019) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858419872701 · Cited by 26
“More recently, a style of personalized learning called context personalization emphasizes the role of both cognitive and non-cognitive factors in fostering deeper learning (Walkington, 2013; Walkington & Bernacki, 2018).”
BackgroundPersonalized Learning in Algebra
Walkington, C., Sherman, M. F., & Howell, E. (2014) · Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12 · doi:10.5951/mathteacher.108.4.0272 · Cited by 25
The Double-Edged Interactions of Prompts and Self-efficacy
Gentner, N. M., & Seufert, T. (2020) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-020-09227-7 · Cited by 33
“In the field of mathematics, tailoring algebra-problems to learners’ situational interest increased learners’ interest and learning of algebra concepts (Bernacki and Walkington 2014; Walkington 2013).”
BackgroundScaffolding middle school mathematics curricula with large language models
Malik, R., Abdi, D., Wang, R., & Demszky, D. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13571 · Cited by 37
“This may include adding warmup tasks, formative assessments, or culturally relevant adaptations (Meidl & Meidl, 2011; Walkington, 2013).”
Maritime Education and Training in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond
Renganayagalu, S. K., Mallam, S., & Hernes, M. (2022) · TransNav the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation · doi:10.12716/1001.16.01.06 · Cited by 23
“Adaptive Learning (AL) is considered as the next stage of computer assisted training as AL systems have the ability to provide students with immediate assistance and resources specific to their learning needs, and relevant feedback [46].”
BackgroundKlipfel, K. (2014) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/rsr-08-2013-0043 · Cited by 23
Benefits of adaptive lessons for pre-class preparation in a flipped numerical methods course
Clark, R. M., & Kaw, A. K. (2019) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2019.1617439 · Cited by 23
“Today’s students are used to customization as well as having interaction and control when searching for knowledge and information [1].”
BackgroundVindigni, G. (2023) · European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences · doi:10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(4).66 · Cited by 31
“com EJTAS 2023 | Volume 1 | Number 4 726 allows instruction to be continuously tailored to build upon and respond sensitively to each learner’s existing mental models, misconceptions, and developmental level to scaffold the active assimilation and accommodation processes by which individuals construct new understandin…”
BackgroundAdaptive Learning Systems: Harnessing AI for Customized Educational Experiences
Kolluru, V., Mungara, S., & Chintakunta, A. N. (2018) · International Journal of Computational Science and Information Technology · doi:10.5121/ijcsity.2018.6302 · Cited by 22
“Walkington (2013) illustrated that tailoring instruction to student interests not boosts motivation but also enhances performance emphasizing the importance of relevance in engaging students.”
BackgroundInfluentialInterest-enhancing approaches to mathematics curriculum design: Illustrations and personalization
Clinton‐Lisell, V., & Walkington, C. (2019) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2019.1568958 · Cited by 21
“Personalization is an instructional approach that connects mathematics tasks to students’ out-of-school interests in topics such as sports, shopping, and video games (Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Impact of a Personalization Intervention for Mathematics on Learning and Non-Cognitive Factors
Bernacki, M. L., & Walkington, C. (2014) · doi:10.13140/2.1.4342.1445 · Cited by 20
Aslan, S., Alyüz, N., Li, B., Durham, L., Shi, M., Sharma, S., & Nachman, L. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100393 · Cited by 28
Ostrow, K., Heffernan, N. T., & Williams, J. J. (2017) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811711900308 · Cited by 18
“• Adapting instructional materials to students’ personal & peer interests (Walkington, 2013) • Embedding software and dynamics for peer assistance (Walker, Rummel, & Koedinger, 2011) • Examining how confidence affects performance in early algebra (Mazzocco, Murphy, Brown, Rinne, & Herold, 2013)”
BackgroundYoung learners’ motivation, self-regulation and performance in personalized learning
Ackermans, K., Bakker, M., van Loon, A., Kral, M., & Camp, G. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105208 · Cited by 39
Disembodied AI and the limits to machine understanding of students' embodied interactions
Nathan, M. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1148227 · Cited by 20
“…has coincided with growing expectations for computers to deliver data-driven, real-time directives for education, such as personalized learning (Walkington, 2013) and assessment, added pressures from a global pandemic that disrupted standard, in-person learning, and a lack of oversight or…”
BackgroundHidden Gems Breakthrough Dynamic Landscape of Adaptive Learning Technologies for Higher Education
Singh, B., & Kaunert, C. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3641-0.ch010 · Cited by 18
Pozas, M., Löffler, P., Schnotz, W., & Kauertz, A. (2020) · Open Education Studies · doi:10.1515/edu-2020-0118 · Cited by 28
“According to Walkington (2013), contexts activate interest while helping ground abstract ideas and their prior knowledge within concrete real-life experiences.”
BackgroundTeachers’ understanding of the concept of ‘embedding’ digital technology in education
Feerick, E., Clerkin, A., & Cosgrove, J. (2022) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2021.2022521 · Cited by 17
“A study by Walkington (2013) used a software programme that asked students about their interests (e.g. sport, music), and then incorporated these interests into algebra instructional material.”
MethodExtending Cognitive Load Theory: The CLAM Framework for Biometric, Adaptive, and Ethical Learning
Vasilaki, E., & Mavrogianni, A. (2025) · Psychology International · doi:10.3390/psycholint7020040 · Cited by 26
Roure, C., & Pasco, D. (2022) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2021-0283 · Cited by 16
Will AI reshape or deform pharmacy education?
Ali, M. (2024) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102274 · Cited by 19
Spaced E-learning for Sustainable Education
Kapenieks, J., & Kapenieks, J. (2020) · Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability · doi:10.2478/jtes-2020-0016 · Cited by 15
Leave Her out of It: Person‐Presentation of Strategies is Harmful for Transfer
Riggs, A. E., Alibali, M. W., & Kalish, C. W. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12224 · Cited by 15
“Research illustrating the benefits of using real-world contexts in textbooks has found that this practice increases student engagement (Alexander & Jetton, 1996), highlights the personal relevance of concepts to students (Walkington, 2013), and decreases mathematics anxiety (Martinez, 1987).”
BackgroundEffects of Educational Technology on Mathematics Achievement for K-12 Students in Utah
Brasiel, S., Jeong, S., Ames, C., Lawanto, K., Yuan, M., & Martin, T. (2016) · Journal of Online Learning Research · doi:10.70725/494567cmmgyl · Cited by 15
“…developers can also consider options for development that keep a student engaged, such as allowing the student to select a different avatar or setting, since there is some prior research evidence to support the impact of allowing students to personalize their learning experience (Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Digital Divide in Language and Literacy Education
Tate, T. P., & Warschauer, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_5 · Cited by 15
The Multidimensional Structure of Interest
Draijer, J., Bakker, A., Slot, E. M., & Akkerman, S. F. (2020) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v8i4.577 · Cited by 14
“…appreciated particularly because it generates a learning process that appears natural and intrinsic to the person, and therefore fits with new models of education that depart from person-centered, life-wide and connected learning approaches (e.g., Barron, 2006; Ito et al., 2018; Walkington, 2013).”
BackgroundThe role of students’ interests during computer-assisted learning: A field experiment
Iterbeke, K., Schelfhout, W., & Witte, K. D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107168 · Cited by 14
Hao, C., Xu, W., Halim, H. A., & Hao, M. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251352595 · Cited by 16
Pelánek, R., Effenberger, T., & Jarušek, P. (2024) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-024-09396-z · Cited by 19
“In addition to personalization based on student knowledge state, it is useful to take into account also student interests and to present tasks that are contextualized with respect to these interests (Cordova and Lepper 1996; Walkington 2013).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Walkington, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Southern Methodist University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Walkington, Candace A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 932-945
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2314181201
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SBE-0354420)
- US Department of Education (R305B100007)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Keywords
- adaptive learning systems, personalized instruction, student interest, intelligent tutoring systems, high school mathematics, algebra word problems, transfer of learning, struggling students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review