Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice.
Abstract
This experiment examined the effects on the learning process of 3 complementary strategies—contextualization, personalization, and provision of choices—for enhancing students' intrinsic motivation. Elementary school children in 1 control and 4 experimental conditions worked with educational computer activities designed to teach arithmetical order-ofoperations rules. In the control condition, this material was presented abstractly. In the experimental conditions, identical material was presented in meaningful and appealing learning contexts, in either generic or individually personalized form. Half of the students in each group were also offered choices concerning instructionally incidental aspects of the learning contexts; the remainder were not. Contextualization, personalization, and choice all produced dramatic increases, not only in students' motivation but also in their depth of engagement in learning, the amount they learned in a fixed time period, and their perceived competence and levels of aspiration. Learning, every parent knows, can be fun. From the dogged dedication of the infant learning to walk and the voraciousness of the toddler first learning the names of objects to the insatiable curiosity of the preschooler wanting to know the why behind everything, astute observers from Plato to Piaget have remarked upon young children's intrinsic love for learning. There are, it appears, no preschool children with motivational deficits. Yet only a few years later, after these same children have entered school, their motivation to learn has somehow become decidedly more problematic. Many of them seem to find the instructional activities in schools to be dull and
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals denied a choice in an activity experience less hedonic return relative to individuals allowed to exercise a choice.
“Support for this idea comes from the large literature documenting how individuals denied a choice in an activity experience less hedonic return relative to individuals allowed to exercise a choice [58–60].”
From Five studies evaluating the impact on mental health and mood of recalling, reading, and discussing fiction (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · see citing works
The Perceived Competence Scale for Children
Harter, S. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129640 · Cited by 3,639 · see citing works
A common language effect size statistic
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361 · Cited by 934 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, in terms of McGraw and Wong's (1992) common language effect size statistic (CL), there is a probability of .”
BackgroundThe overjustification effect: A meta‐analysis
Tang, S., & Hall, V. C. (1995) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350090502 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702 · see citing works
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games.
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031311 · Cited by 1,864 · see citing works
What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x · Cited by 1,840 · see citing works
REEVE, J. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903028990 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
Academic Emotions and Student Engagement
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270 · Cited by 1,101 · see citing works
From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience
Squire, K. (2006) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x035008019 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
A META‐ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER‐BASED SIMULATION GAMES
SITZMANN, T. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x · Cited by 882 · see citing works
Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control
Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732216655542 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
You Can't Always Get What You Want: Educational Attainment, Agency, and Choice.
Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes: Review and Research Proposals
Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J. L., Orvis, K. L., & Conkey, C. (2009) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878108321866 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for..
Brophy, J. (1999) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3402_1 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Increasing Situational Interest in the Classroom
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1016619705184 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Empirically Building and Evaluating a Probabilistic Model of User Affect
Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-009-9062-8 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Walkington, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031882 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G.-J., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1381067 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Ronimus, M., Kujala, J., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.008 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning
Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., & Wulf, G. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002) · Improving Academic Achievement · doi:10.1016/b978-012064455-1/50010-5 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationGaron-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Guay, F., Kovas, Y., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J.-P., Séguin, J. R., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2016) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12458 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
An Evaluation of Gamified Training: Using Narrative to Improve Reactions and Learning
Armstrong, M. B., & Landers, R. N. (2017) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878117703749 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
How Self-Determined Choice Facilitates Performance: A Key Role of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex
Murayama, K., Matsumoto, M., Izuma, K., Sugiura, A., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Matsumoto, K. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht317 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities
Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12067 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Campos, T. (2012) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
GPT-3-Driven Pedagogical Agents to Train Children’s Curious Question-Asking Skills
Abdelghani, R., Wang, Y.-H., Yuan, X., Wang, T., Lucas, P., Sauzéon, H., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00340-7 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Waterschoot, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104692 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Motivations in personalisation behaviour
Oulasvirta, A., & Blom, J. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.06.002 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Parental Autonomy Support in Two Cultures: The Moderating Effects of Adolescents’ Self-Construals
Marbell-Pierre, K. N., Grolnick, W. S., Stewart, A. L., & Raftery-Helmer, J. N. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12947 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Mangaroska, K., Sharma, K., Gašević, D., & Giannakos, M. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12590 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Enhancing learning outcomes through self-regulated learning support with an Open Learner Model
Long, Y., & Aleven, V. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-016-9186-6 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Dolcos, S., & Albarracin, D. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2048 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Lomas, J. D., Koedinger, K., Patel, N., Shodhan, S., Poonwala, N., & Forlizzi, J. L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025638 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Montessori education's impact on academic and nonacademic outcomes: A systematic review
Randolph, J. J., Bryson, A., Menon, L., Henderson, D. K., Kureethara Manuel, A., Michaels, S., rosenstein, D. L. W., McPherson, W., O'Grady, R., & Lillard, A. S. (2023) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.1002/cl2.1330 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Conversational agents for fostering curiosity-driven learning in children
Abdelghani, R., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Law, E., de Vulpillières, C., & Sauzéon, H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102887 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Cheng, A. Y., Guo, M., Ran, M., Ranasaria, A., Sharma, A., Xie, A., Le, K. N., Vinaithirthan, B., Luan, S. (., Wright, D. T. H., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642041 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Pedagogical Agents for Fostering Question-Asking Skills in Children
Alaimi, M., Law, E., Pantasdo, K. D., Oudeyer, P.-Y., & Sauzeon, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376776 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Carlisle, S., Ayling, K., Jia, R., Buchanan, H., & Vedhara, K. (2022) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2021.1962386 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Carney, J., & Robertson, C. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266323 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Burgess, M., Enzle, M. E., & Schmaltz, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204264089 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
How the Subjective Relationship Between the Self, Others, and a Task Drives Interest
Master, A., Butler, L. P., & Walton, G. M. (2017) · The Science of Interest · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55509-6_11 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The (non-)benefit of choosing: If you get what you want it is not important that you chose it
Wilde, M., Basten, M., Großmann, N., Haunhorst, D., Desch, I., Strüber, M., & Randler, C. (2018) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9675-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 715-730
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2122025961
- Cited by
- 1,568
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 93
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- intrinsic motivation, contextualization, personalization, choice, elementary school students, order of operations, mathematics learning, perceived competence, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
