The role of semantic self-perceptions in temporal distance perceptions toward autobiographical events: The semantic congruence model.
Abstract
Why do some autobiographical events feel as if they happened yesterday, whereas others feel like ancient history? Such temporal distance perceptions have surprisingly little to do with actual calendar time distance. Instead, psychologists have found that people typically perceive positive autobiographical events as overly recent, while perceiving negative events as overly distant. The origins of this temporal distance bias have been sought in self-enhancement strivings and mood congruence between autobiographical events and chronic mood. As such, past research exclusively focused on the evaluative features of autobiographical events, while neglecting semantic features. To close this gap, we introduce a semantic congruence model. Capitalizing on the Big Two self-perception dimensions, Study 1 showed that high semantic congruence between recalled autobiographical events and trait self-perceptions render the recalled events subjectively recent. Specifically, interpersonally warm (competent) individuals perceived autobiographical events reflecting warmth (competence) as relatively recent, but warm (competent) individuals did not perceive events reflecting competence (warmth) as relatively recent. Study 2 found that conscious perceptions of congruence mediate these effects. Studies 3 and 4 showed that neither mood congruence nor self-enhancement account for these results. Study 5 extended the results from the Big Two to the Big Five self-perception dimensions, while affirming the independence of the semantic congruence model from evaluative influences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examining the unique relation of each Big Five trait with self-esteem safeguards against alternative third-variable explanations.
“Examining the unique relation of each Big Five trait with self-esteem safeguards against such alternative thirdvariable explanations (Gebauer, Haddock, Broemer, & von Hecker, 2013).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Gebauer, Haddock, Broemer, & von Hecker, 2013
Cites
Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions
Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Positivity of Self-Views: Two Portraits of Self-Love
Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E. A., & Sedikides, C. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202286007 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Counteracting Loneliness: On the Restorative Function of Nostalgia
Zhou, X., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., & Gao, D.-G. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02194.x · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Odyssey's end: Lay conceptions of nostalgia reflect its original Homeric meaning
Hepper, E. G., Ritchie, T. D., Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0025167 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.792 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Gebauer, J. E., Wagner, J., Sedikides, C., & Neberich, W. (2013) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00807.x · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Wagner, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000052 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gebauer, J. E., Haddock, G., Broemer, P., & von Hecker, U.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 852-872
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2032732862
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, semantic congruence, Big Five personality traits, self-enhancement, mood congruence, subjective time, warmth and competence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality, Self Concept, Semantics, Time Perception, Mental Competency, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review