Cited by 172Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Agency‐Communion and Self‐Esteem Relations Are Moderated by Culture, Religiosity, Age, and Sex: Evidence for the “Self‐Centrality Breeds Self‐Enhancement” Principle

Open access
Gebauer, Jochen E., Wagner, Jenny, Sedikides, Constantine, Neberich, Wiebke·2013·Journal of Personality

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Who has high self-esteem? Is it ambitious, competitive, outgoing people-agentic personalities? Or is it caring, honest, understanding people-communal personalities? The literature on agency-communion and self-esteem is sparse, indirect, and inconsistent. Based on William James's theorizing, we propose the "self-centrality breeds self-enhancement" principle. Accordingly, agency will be linked to self-esteem, if agency is self-central. Conversely, communion will be linked to self-esteem, if communion is self-central. But what determines the self-centrality of agency and communion? The literature suggests that agency is self-central in agentic cultures, as well as among nonreligious individuals, men, and younger adults. Communion is self-central in communal cultures, as well as among religious individuals, women, and older adults. METHOD: This study examined 187,957 people (47% female; mean age = 37.49 years, SD = 12.22) from 11 cultures. The large sample size afforded us the opportunity to test simultaneously the effect of all four moderators in a single two-level model (participants nested in cultures). RESULTS: Results supported the unique moderating effect of culture, religiosity, age, and sex on the relation between agency-communion and self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: Agentic and communal people can both have high self-esteem, depending on self-centrality of agency and communion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00807.x

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebauer, J. E., Wagner, J., Sedikides, C., & Neberich, W.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Affinitas GmbH
Corresponding author
Gebauer, Jochen E.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
261-275
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1548902715
Cited by
172
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-esteem, agency, communion, self-enhancement, culture, religiosity, age, sex differences, William James, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Culture, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Religion, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review