Cited by 43Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

The effect of intranasal oxytocin on perceiving and understanding emotion on the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT)

Cardoso, Christopher, Ellenbogen, Mark A., Linnen, Anne-Marie·2014·Emotion

Abstract

Evidence suggests that intranasal oxytocin enhances the perception of emotion in facial expressions during standard emotion identification tasks. However, it is not clear whether this effect is desirable in people who do not show deficits in emotion perception. That is, a heightened perception of emotion in faces could lead to "oversensitivity" to the emotions of others in nonclinical participants. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of intranasal oxytocin on emotion perception using ecologically valid social and nonsocial visual tasks. Eighty-two participants (42 women) self-administered a 24 IU dose of intranasal oxytocin or a placebo in a double-blind, randomized experiment and then completed the perceiving and understanding emotion components of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. In this test, emotion identification accuracy is based on agreement with a normative sample. As expected, participants administered intranasal oxytocin rated emotion in facial stimuli as expressing greater emotional intensity than those given a placebo. Consequently, accurate identification of emotion in faces, based on agreement with a normative sample, was impaired in the oxytocin group relative to placebo. No such effect was observed for tests using nonsocial stimuli. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that intranasal oxytocin enhances the salience of social stimuli in the environment, but not nonsocial stimuli. The present findings support a growing…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent studies in humans suggest that Oxt's effects are nuanced and that intranasal Oxt treatment can have undesirable effects.

    “Thus, it is perhaps not surprising that more recent studies in humans suggest that Oxt’s effects are nuanced (as the data from animal models would suggest) and that intranasal Oxt treatment can have undesirable effects (106–108).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardoso, C., Ellenbogen, M. A., & Linnen, A.-M.
Affiliations
Concordia University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2014
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
43-50
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2038764064
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, emotion perception, emotional understanding, emotional intelligence, facial expression recognition, emotion recognition, social cognition, social salience, placebo effect
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Models, Psychological, Oxytocin, Perception, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review