Cited by 67Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Distress of ostracism: oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism confers sensitivity to social exclusion

Open access
McQuaid, Robyn J., McInnis, Opal A., Matheson, Kimberly, Anisman, Hymie·2015·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

A single-nucleotide polymorphism on the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR), rs53576, involving a guanine (G) to adenine (A) substitution has been associated with altered prosocial features. Specifically, individuals with the GG genotype (i.e. the absence of the polymorphism) display beneficial traits including enhanced trust, empathy and self-esteem. However, because G carriers might also be more socially sensitive, this may render them more vulnerable to the adverse effects of a negative social stressor. The current investigation, conducted among 128 white female undergraduate students, demonstrated that relative to individuals with AA genotype, G carriers were more emotionally sensitive (lower self-esteem) in response to social ostracism promoted through an on-line ball tossing game (Cyberball). Furthermore, GG individuals also exhibited altered blood pressure and cortisol levels following rejection, effects not apparent among A carriers. The data support the view that the presence of the G allele not only promotes prosocial behaviors but also favors sensitivity to a negative social stressor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsu166

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McQuaid, R. J., McInnis, O. A., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neuroscience, and
  • Carleton University (CA)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2015-01-05
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
1153-1159
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2132506350
Cited by
67
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (MOP-106591)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin receptor gene, OXTR rs53576, social exclusion, ostracism, emotional sensitivity, self-esteem, social stress, cortisol, blood pressure, prosocial behavior, genetic polymorphism, Cyberball
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Blood Pressure, Empathy, Female, Games, Experimental, Genotype, Heterozygote, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Interpersonal Relations, Mutation, Polymorphism, Genetic, Rejection, Psychology, Self Concept, Psychological Distance, Receptors, Oxytocin, Amino Acid Substitution, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review