Cited by 137Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The multigroup ethnic identity measure—revised: measurement invariance across racial and ethnic groups

Open access
Brown, Susan D., Unger Hu, Kirsten A., Mevi, Ashley A., Hedderson, Monique M., Shan, Jun, Quesenberry, Charles P., Ferrara, Assiamira·2014·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure-Revised (MEIM-R), a brief instrument assessing affiliation with one's ethnic group, is a promising advance in the ethnic identity literature. However, equivalency of its measurement properties across specific racial and ethnic groups should be confirmed before using it in diverse samples. We examined (a) the psychometric properties of the MEIM-R, including factor structure, measurement invariance, and internal consistency reliability, and (b) levels of and differences in ethnic identity across multiple racial and ethnic groups and subgroups. Asian (n = 630), Black/African American (n = 58), Hispanic (n = 240), multiethnic (n = 160), and White (n = 375) women completed the MEIM-R as part of the "Gestational diabetes' Effect on Moms" diabetes prevention trial in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care setting (N = 1,463; M age = 32.5 years, SD = 4.9). Multiple-groups confirmatory factor analyses provided provisional evidence of measurement invariance, i.e., an equal, correlated 2-factor structure, equal factor loadings, and equal item intercepts across racial and ethnic groups. Latent factor means for the 2 MEIM-R subscales, exploration and commitment, differed across groups; effect sizes ranging from small to large generally supported the notion of ethnic identity as more salient among people of color. Pending replication, good psychometric properties in this large and diverse sample of women support the future use of the MEIM-R. Preliminary evidence of measurement invariance suggests that the MEIM-R could be used to measure and compare ethnic identity across multiple racial and ethnic groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034749

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MEIM-R has a correlated two-factor structure with measurement invariance across Whites, African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and multi-ethnic respondents.

    “The MEIM-R has a correlated two-factor structure with measurement invariance across Whites, African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and multi-ethnic respondents (Brown et al., 2014).”

    From Assessment of culture and environment in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Rationale, description of measures, and early data (2018) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2014

    The Discussion reports that a correlated two-factor model fit fairly well and that analyses found provisional evidence of measurement invariance across the five named groups. The claim omits that qualification and presents the finding as established beyond the study’s sample of women; the authors say replication is needed. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Research has indicated good reliability for the MEIM-R, with internal consistency (Cronbach's α) ranging from 0.76 to 0.91 for the two subscales and 0.81-0.89 for the overall scale.

    “Research has indicated good reliability, with internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) ranging from 0.76 to 0.91 for the two subscales and 0.81–0.89 for the overall scale (Phinney and Ong, 2007; Yoon, 2011; Brown et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion no. 504: Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011 118 751 753 21860317
  2. Cachelin FM Phinney JS Schug RA Striegel-Moore RM Acculturation and eating disorders in a Mexican American community sample Psychology of Women Quarterly 2006 30 340 347
  3. Cokley K Critical issues in the measurement of ethnic and racial identity: A referendum on the state of the field Journal of Counseling Psychology 2007 54 224 234
  4. Gaines SO Jr. Bunce D Robertson T Wright B Goossens Y Heer D Minhas S Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) within the United Kingdom Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 2010 10 1 19
  5. Institute of Medicine Subcommittee on Standardized Collection of Race/Ethnicity Data for Healthcare Quality Improvement Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data: Standardization for Health Care Quality Improvement 2009 Washington, DC National Academies Press 25032349
  6. Marcia J Adelson J Identity in adolescence Handbook of adolescent psychology 1980 New York Wiley 159 187
  7. Ong AD Fuller-Rowell TE Phinney JS Measurement of ethnic identity: Recurrent and emergent issues Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 2010 10 39 49
  8. Phinney JS The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups Journal of Adolescent Research 1992 7 156 176
  9. Phinney JS Ong AD Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions Journal of Counseling Psychology 2007 54 271 281
  10. Ponterotto JG Mallinckrodt B Introduction to the special section on racial and ethnic identity in counseling psychology: Conceptual and methodological challenges and proposed solutions Journal of Counseling Psychology 2007 54 219 223
  11. Quintana SM Racial and ethnic identity: Developmental perspectives and research Journal of Counseling Psychology 2007 54 259 270
  12. Roberts RE Phinney JS Masse LC Chen YR Roberts CR Romero A The structure of ethnic identity of young adolescents from diverse ethnocultural groups The Journal of Early Adolescence 1999 19 301 322
  13. Rockquemore KA Brunsma DL Delgado DJ Racing to theory or retheorizing race? Understanding the struggle to build a multiracial identity theory Journal of Social Issues 2009 65 13 34
  14. Trimble JE Prolegomena for the connotation of construct use in the measurement of ethnic and racial identity Journal of Counseling Psychology 2007 54 247 258

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, S. D., Unger Hu, K. A., Mevi, A. A., Hedderson, M. M., Shan, J., Quesenberry, C. P., & Ferrara, A.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2014-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
154-161
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W1976459851
Cited by
137
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
15.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS019367)
  • National Institutes of Health (P30 DK092924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
ethnic identity, measurement invariance, racial and ethnic groups, psychometric properties, factor structure, gestational diabetes mellitus, women of color, Kaiser Permanente Northern California
MeSH terms
Asian, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Identification, Reproducibility of Results, Diabetes, Gestational, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review