Cited by 159Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Press CRTT to measure aggressive behavior: The unstandardized use of the competitive reaction time task in aggression research.

Open access
Elson, Malte, Mohseni, M. Rohangis, Breuer, Johannes, Scharkow, Michael, Quandt, Thorsten·2014·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The competitive reaction time task (CRTT) is the measure of aggressive behavior most commonly used in laboratory research. However, the test has been criticized for issues in standardization because there are many different test procedures and at least 13 variants to calculate a score for aggressive behavior. We compared the different published analyses of the CRTT using data from 3 different studies to scrutinize whether it would yield the same results. The comparisons revealed large differences in significance levels and effect sizes between analysis procedures, suggesting that the unstandardized use and analysis of the CRTT have substantial impacts on the results obtained, as well as their interpretations. Based on the outcome of our comparisons, we provide suggestions on how to address some of the issues associated with the CRTT, as well as a guideline for researchers studying aggressive behavior in the laboratory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035569

Cites

60 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a high level of methodological flexibility in the ways that aggression outcomes and violent gaming are assessed in the literature.

    “our review of the literature made it clear that there is a high level of methodological flexibility in the ways that aggression outcomes and violent gaming are assessed [46,75]”

    From Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report (2019) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Standardization section describes inconsistent CRTT procedures and analyses for measuring aggression, and the Convergence of the different scores section shows that different aggression scores can yield substantially different results. The paper's Study 1 and Study 2 sections use different violent-game conditions, but the cited passages do not establish a high level of flexibility in how violent gaming itself is assessed across the literature. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human aggression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  2. Zillmann, D. (1983). Arousal and aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews (Vol. 1, pp. 75-102). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elson, M., Mohseni, M. R., Breuer, J., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Osnabrück University (DE)
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2014-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
419-432
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2017626898
Cited by
159
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sponsor name not included (240864 (SOFOGA))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
competitive reaction time task, aggression, aggression measurement, test standardization, effect size, significance level
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Competitive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review