Cited by 114Narrative Theory and AnalysisMedia Influence and HealthEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self.

Djikic, Maja, Oatley, Keith·2014·Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Abstract

Abstraction and thevividness of details in fiction . Paper presented at the 111th annualconvention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Can-ada.Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006).Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, diver-gent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictionalsocial worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the linkbetween reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differencesand examining outcomes. Communications: The European Journal ofCommunication, 34, 407–428.Mar, R. A., Tackett, J. L., & Moore, C. (2010). Exposure to media andtheory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development,25, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood . NewYork, NY: Guilford Press.McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation ofpersonality theories: Theoretical context for the five-factor model. InJ. S. Wiggins (Ed.),

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0037999

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.

    “The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.”
  • Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.

    “Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.”
  • Recent psychology research has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.

    “Recent psychology research (Djikic & Oatley, 2014, review) has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Published
2014-11
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
498-505
ISSN
  • 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-390X
OpenAlex
W2321725901
Cited by
114
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
174.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
fiction, art in fiction, abstraction, empathy, theory of mind, fiction reading, social skills, personality, Big Five personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review