The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self.
Abstract
Abstraction and thevividness of details in fiction . Paper presented at the 111th annualconvention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Can-ada.Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006).Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, diver-gent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictionalsocial worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the linkbetween reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differencesand examining outcomes. Communications: The European Journal ofCommunication, 34, 407–428.Mar, R. A., Tackett, J. L., & Moore, C. (2010). Exposure to media andtheory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development,25, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood . NewYork, NY: Guilford Press.McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation ofpersonality theories: Theoretical context for the five-factor model. InJ. S. Wiggins (Ed.),
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.
“The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.”
From Reading Books and Reading Minds: Differential Effects of Wonder and The Crossover on Empathy and Theory of Mind (2017) · cites this paper as Djikic and Oatley (2014)
Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.
“Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.”
From Reading Books and Reading Minds: Differential Effects of Wonder and The Crossover on Empathy and Theory of Mind (2017) · cites this paper as Djikic and Oatley (2014)
Recent psychology research has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.
“Recent psychology research (Djikic & Oatley, 2014, review) has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.”
From Reading Books and Reading Minds: Differential Effects of Wonder and The Crossover on Empathy and Theory of Mind (2017) · cites this paper as Djikic & Oatley, 2014
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272 · see citing works
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00076512 · Cited by 8,743 · see citing works
Bonanno, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20 · Cited by 6,851 · see citing works
Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review
Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1023/b:jots.0000014671.27856.7e · Cited by 2,260 · see citing works
Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239918 · Cited by 1,642 · see citing works
The Neural Bases of Social Cognition and Story Comprehension
Mar, R. A. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009) · COMM · doi:10.1515/comm.2009.025 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, D. R. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
On Being Moved by Art: How Reading Fiction Transforms the Self
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. B. (2009) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410802633392 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Self-citationReading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S. (2013) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0033261 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity.
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A. (2013) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0034084 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Troscianko, E. T. (2018) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2017-011375 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Guarisco, M. S., Brooks, C., & Freeman, L. M. (2017) · Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature · doi:10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2017.3.1.24-54 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Djikic, M., & Oatley, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Oatley, Keith
- Venue
- Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 498-505
- ISSN
- 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2321725901
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 174.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
- Keywords
- fiction, art in fiction, abstraction, empathy, theory of mind, fiction reading, social skills, personality, Big Five personality traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review