Cited by 91Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Reward guides attention to object categories in real-world scenes.

Open access
Hickey, Clayton, Kaiser, Daniel, Peelen, Marius V.·2015·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Reward is thought to motivate animal-approach behavior in part by automatically facilitating the perceptual processing of reward-associated visual stimuli. Studies have demonstrated this effect for low-level visual features such as color and orientation. However, outside of the laboratory, it is rare that low-level features uniquely characterize objects relevant for behavior. Here, we test whether reward can prime representations at the level of object category. Participants detected category exemplars (cars, trees, people) in briefly presented photographs of real-world scenes. On a subset of trials, successful target detection was rewarded and the effect of this reward was measured on the subsequent trial. Results show that rewarded selection of a category exemplar caused other members of this category to become visually salient, disrupting search when subsequently presented as distractors. It is important to note that this occurred even when there was little opportunity for the repetition of visual features between examples, with the rewarded selection of a human body increasing the salience of a subsequently presented face. Thus, selection of a category example appears to activate representations of prototypical category characteristics even when these are not present in the stimulus. In this way, reward can guide attention to categories of stimuli even when individual examples share no visual characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0038627

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]13. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010a). Reward guides attention via anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(33), 11096 -11106.
  2. [36]36. Toates, F. (1986). Motivational Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickey, C., Kaiser, D., & Peelen, M. V.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2015
Volume
144
Issue
2
Pages
264-273
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2095020810
Cited by
91
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (016–125-283)
  • Autonomous Province of Trento
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
reward, attention, object categories, visual saliency, visual search, real-world scenes, face perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reward, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review