Cited by 329Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses

Della Libera, Chiara, Chelazzi, Leonardo·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

Efficient goal-directed behavior in a crowded world is crucially mediated by visual selective attention (VSA), which regulates deployment of cognitive resources toward selected, behaviorally relevant visual objects. Acting as a filter on perceptual representations, VSA allows preferential processing of relevant objects and concurrently inhibits traces of irrelevant items, thus preventing harmful distraction. Recent evidence showed that monetary rewards for performance on VSA tasks strongly affect immediately subsequent deployment of attention; a typical aftereffect of VSA (negative priming) was found only following highly rewarded selections. Here we report a much more striking demonstration that the controlled delivery of monetary rewards also affects attentional processing several days later. Thus, the propensity to select or to ignore specific visual objects appears to be strongly biased by the more or less rewarding consequences of past attentional encounters with the same objects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies have examined the impact of reward on early cognitive processes, such as visual perception and attention.

    “Reward plays a fundamental role in human cognition, but surprisingly few studies have examined the impact of reward on early cognitive processes, such as visual perception and attention (but see Della Libera and Chelazzi, 2009).”

    From Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate (2010) · cites this paper as Della Libera and Chelazzi, 2009

  • In Della Libera and Chelazzi (2009), performance during the test session was modulated as a function of the specific role of the shapes during the training session.

    “The results showed that performance during the test session was modulated as a function of the specific role of the shapes during the training session.”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009

  • "Attentional suppression responses" can be learned in a way akin to instrumental conditioning.

    “At least one study demonstrated that “attentional suppression responses” can be learned in a way akin to instrumental conditioning (Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009

  • When attentional suppression of a specific stimulus was rewarded during training, that stimulus was also more efficiently suppressed during a test session.

    “when attentional suppression of a specific stimulus was rewarded during training, that stimulus was also more efficiently suppressed during a test session.”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009

  • A distinction between Pavlovian and instrumental associations has been demonstrated in behavioral studies.

    “A distinction between both has been demonstrated in behavioral studies (Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009; Le Pelley et al., 2015; see also Chelazzi et al., 2013)”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, Section of Human Physiology, University of Verona, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Verona, Italy
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Chelazzi, Leonardo
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
778-784
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2079448742
Cited by
329
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual selective attention, negative priming, monetary rewards, attentional inhibition, goal-directed behavior, distraction
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology, Reward, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review