Cited by 51Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Adult attachment as a moderator of treatment outcome for generalized anxiety disorder: Comparison between cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) plus supportive listening and CBT plus interpersonal and emotional processing therapy.

Open access
Newman, Michelle G., Castonguay, Louis G., Jacobson, Nicholas C., Moore, Ginger A.·2015·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline dimensions of adult insecure attachment (avoidant and anxious) moderated outcome in a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) plus supportive listening (CBT + SL) versus CBT plus interpersonal and emotional processing therapy (CBT + I/EP). METHOD: Eighty-three participants diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were recruited from the community and assigned randomly to CBT + SL (n = 40) or to CBT + I/EP (n = 43) within a study using an additive design. PhD-level psychologists treated participants. Blind assessors evaluated participants at pretreatment, posttreatment, 6-month, 12-month, and 2-year follow-up with a composite of self-report and assessor-rated GAD symptom measures (Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Clinician's Severity Rating). Avoidant and anxious attachment were assessed using self-reported dismissing and angry states of mind, respectively, on the Perceptions of Adult Attachment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Consistent with our prediction, at all assessments higher levels of dismissing styles in those who received CBT + I/EP predicted greater change in GAD symptoms compared with those who received CBT + SL for whom dismissiveness was unrelated to the change. At postassessment, higher angry attachment was associated with less change in GAD symptoms for those receiving CBT + I/EP, compared with CBT + SL, for whom anger was unrelated to change in GAD symptoms. Pretreatment attachment-related anger failed to moderate outcome at other time points and therefore, these moderation effects were more short-lived than the ones for dismissing attachment. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CBT + SL, CBT + I/EP may be better for individuals with GAD who have relatively higher dismissing styles of attachment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0039359

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clients reporting dismissive childhood attachment respond more strongly to CBT plus interpersonal and emotional processing therapy than to CBT plus supportive listening.

    “clients reporting dismissive childhood attachment responded more strongly to CBT+I/EP versus CBT+SL [42].”

    From Psychotherapeutic treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: cognitive and behavioral therapies, enhancement strategies, and emerging efforts (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (Abstract) report that higher dismissing styles predicted greater improvement in GAD symptoms with CBT + I/EP than with CBT + SL. But the Method (Measures) identifies dismissing/derogating as a measure of clients’ current attitudes toward their primary caregiver, not their childhood attachment; the Discussion likewise describes it as current adult attachment. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bowlby J 1973 Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation New York Basic Books
  2. Brown TA Di Nardo PA Barlow DH 1994 Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM–IV New York Oxford University Press
  3. Fraley RC Waller NG 1998 Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model Simpson JA Rholes WS Attachment theory and close relationships 77 114 New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newman, M. G., Castonguay, L. G., Jacobson, N. C., & Moore, G. A.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2015-10
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
915-925
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2346691996
Cited by
51
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH58593-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
adult attachment, insecure attachment, generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, dismissing attachment, attachment styles
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review