Cited by 111Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth Development and Social Support

The randomized controlled trial of Head Start REDI: Sustained effects on developmental trajectories of social–emotional functioning.

Open access
Nix, Robert L., Bierman, Karen L., Heinrichs, Brenda S., Gest, Scott D., Welsh, Janet A., Domitrovich, Celene E.·2016·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the sustained effects of Head Start REDI (Research-based, Developmentally Informed), a randomized controlled preschool preventive intervention, on children's developmental trajectories of social-emotional functioning into elementary school. METHOD: Twenty-five Head Start centers with 44 classrooms were randomly assigned to deliver Head Start REDI or Head Start as usual. Head Start REDI featured an integrated language-emergent literacy and social-emotional skills curriculum and enhanced support for positive teaching practices. The 356 4-year-old children (54% girls; 25% African American; 17% Latino; 70% living in poverty) in those centers and classrooms were followed for 5 years (from preschool through third grade; 91% retention rate). Each year, teachers rated multiple domains of social-emotional functioning. Person-oriented latent class growth models were used to identify the different developmental trajectories of social-emotional functioning that children followed. RESULTS: Tests of proportions revealed that children who had been in the Head Start REDI intervention were statistically significantly more likely than children in the control condition to follow the most optimal developmental trajectories of social competence, aggressive-oppositional behavior, learning engagement, attention problems, student-teacher closeness, and peer rejection (odds ratio = 1.60-1.93). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that enriching Head Start with evidence-based curriculum components and teaching practices can have long-lasting benefits for children's social-emotional functioning. These findings elucidate how high-quality preschool experiences promote core competencies that are critical to the school success of children living in poverty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0039937

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Head Start REDI RCT, children in the intervention versus control group were significantly more likely to follow optimal developmental trajectories in social behavior, aggressive-oppositional behavior, learning engagement, attention problems, student-teacher closeness, and peer rejection.

    “Children in the Head Start REDI intervention vs. control group were significantly more likely to follow optimal developmental trajectories in social behavior, aggressive-oppositional behavior, learning engagement, attention problems, student-teacher closeness, and peer rejection.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Boivin M Bierman K Promoting school readiness and early learning: The implications of developmental research for practice 2014 Guilford Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nix, R. L., Bierman, K. L., Heinrichs, B. S., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., & Domitrovich, C. E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2016-04
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
310-322
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2324093308
Cited by
111
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
38.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD046064)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
social-emotional functioning, developmental trajectories, social competence, student engagement, attention deficits, peer rejection, early childhood education, long-term effects
MeSH terms
Aggression, Attention, Black or African American, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Curriculum, Educational Status, Emotions, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Learning, Male, Peer Group, Poverty, United States, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review