The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0
Abstract
Parallels in biological, psychological, and behavioral systems have led to the hypothesis that an addictive process may contribute to problematic eating. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) was developed to provide a validated measure of addictive-like eating behavior based upon the diagnostic criteria for substance dependence. Recently, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) was released, which included significant changes to the substance-related and addictive disorders (SRAD) section. In the current study, the YFAS 2.0 was developed to maintain consistency with the current diagnostic understanding of addiction and to improve the psychometric properties of the original YFAS. In a sample of 550 participants, 14.6% met criteria for food addiction. The YFAS 2.0 demonstrated good internal consistency, as well as convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Elevated scores on the YFAS 2.0 were associated with higher rates of obesity and more severe pathological eating (e.g., binge eating). The YFAS 2.0 also appeared to capture a related, but unique construct relative to traditional eating disorders. In a separate sample of 209 participants, the YFAS and YFAS 2.0 were directly compared. Both versions of the YFAS were similarly associated with elevated body mass index, binge eating, and weight cycling. However, exceeding the food addiction threshold was more strongly associated with obesity for the YFAS 2.0 than the original YFAS. Thus, the YFAS 2.0 appears to by a psychometrically sound measure that reflects the current diagnostic understanding of addiction to further investigate the potential role of an addictive process in problematic eating behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With the validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) in 2009 [42] and the updated YFAS 2.0 in 2016 [43], FA in humans has been operationalized across hundreds of studies.”
From Food Addiction and Psychosocial Adversity: Biological Embedding, Contextual Factors, and Public Health Implications (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The YFAS 2.0 (released 2016) reflects updated criteria in the DSM-5 [2].”
From Separating the Signal from the Noise: How Psychiatric Diagnoses Can Help Discern Food Addiction from Dietary Restraint (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Actual causes of death in the United States
McGinnis, J. M. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510180077038 · Cited by 5,480
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687
Grant, B. F., Goldstein, R. B., Saha, T. D., Chou, S. P., Jung, J., Zhang, H., Pickering, R. P., Ruan, W. J., Smith, S. M., Huang, B., et al. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0584 · Cited by 2,556
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414531598 · Cited by 2,136
Gorber, S. C., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2007.00347.x · Cited by 1,945
DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale
Hasin, D. S., O’Brien, C. P., Auriacombe, M., Borges, G., Bucholz, K., Budney, A., Compton, W. M., Crowley, T., Ling, W., Petry, N. M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782 · Cited by 1,622
Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale
Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R., & Brownell, K. D. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003 · Cited by 1,369
Avena, N. M., Rada, P., & Hoebel, B. G. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019 · Cited by 1,358
Stice, E. M., Telch, C. F., & Rizvi, S. L. (2000) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.123 · Cited by 938
Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. ‐., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D. (2013) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2012.01031.x · Cited by 800
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is the evidence for “food addiction?” A systematic review
Gordon, E., Ariel-Donges, A., Bauman, V., & Merlo, L. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10040477 · Cited by 316
Development of the Modified Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0
LaFata, E. M., & Gearhardt, A. N. (2017) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2515 · Cited by 314
Brain–gut–microbiome interactions in obesity and food addiction
Gupta, A., Osadchiy, V., & Mayer, E. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0341-5 · Cited by 279
The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Strickland, J. C., & Stoops, W. W. (2018) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000235 · Cited by 258
Definition of Substance and Non-substance Addiction
Zou, Z., Wang, H., d’Oleire Uquillas, F., Wang, X., Ding, J., & Chen, H. (2017) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5562-1_2 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R., & Brownell, K. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-121
- ISSN
- 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1501
- OpenAlex
- W2394736626
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 68.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- Yale Food Addiction Scale, food addiction, problematic eating, scale development, psychometric validation, obesity, binge eating, weight cycling, eating disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
