Cited by 122Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Ten Years of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: A Review of Version 2.0

Meule, Adrian, Gearhardt, Ashley N.·2019·Current Addiction Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-019-00261-3

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meule, A., & Gearhardt, A. N.
Affiliations
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Meule, Adrian
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2019-06-11
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
218-228
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950174831
Cited by
122
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 1
FWCI
17.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
Yale Food Addiction Scale, food addiction, processed food consumption, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, anorexia nervosa, subthreshold eating disorders, obesity, disordered eating, comorbid mental disorders, prevalence, psychometric validation, construct validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review