Cited by 35Medication Adherence and ComplianceBehavioral Health and InterventionsPharmacy and Medical Practices

The role of psychological science in efforts to improve cardiovascular medication adherence.

Open access
Bosworth, Hayden B., Blalock, Dan V., Hoyle, Rick H., Czajkowski, Susan M., Voils, Corrine I.·2018·American Psychologist

Abstract

Poor adherence to cardiovascular disease medications carries significant psychological, physical, and economic costs, including failure to achieve therapeutic goals, high rates of hospitalization and health care costs, and incidence of death. Despite much effort to design and evaluate adherence interventions, rates of adherence to cardiovascular-related medications have remained relatively stagnant. We identify two major reasons for this: First, interventions have not addressed the time-varying reasons for nonadherence, and 2nd, interventions have not explicitly targeted the self-regulatory processes involved in adherence behavior. Inclusion of basic and applied psychological science in intervention development may improve the efficacy and effectiveness of behavioral interventions to improve adherence. In this article, we use a taxonomy of time-based phases of adherence-including initiation, implementation, and discontinuation-as context within which to review illustrative studies of barriers to adherence, interventions to improve adherence, and self-regulatory processes involved in adherence. Finally, we suggest a framework to translate basic psychological science regarding self-regulation into multicomponent interventions that can address multiple and time-varying barriers to nonadherence across the three adherence phases. The field of psychology is essential to improving medication adherence and associated health outcomes, and concrete steps need to be taken to implement this knowledge in future interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/amp0000316

Cites

70 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological illness and psychological health have been shown to be associated with medication nonadherence or adherence, respectively.

    “Psychological illness and psychological health have been shown to be associated with medication nonadherence or adherence, respectively. 142,147-150”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [149]

    The ‘Initiation: Underpinnings in Psychological Science’ section says that cognitive-affective processes and self-regulation influence adherence, but it does not establish the claimed associations with psychological illness or psychological health. Searches for depression, psychiatric illness, mental well-being, and related terms found no passage in our copy addressing those associations. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bosworth H, & Voils C (2006). Theoretical models to understand adherence In Bosworth H, Oddone E, & Weinberger M (Eds.), Patient treatment adherence: Concepts, interventions, and measurement (pp. 13– 46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Elliot AJ, & Fryer JW (2008). The goal construct in psychology In Shah James Y. & Gardner Wendi L. (Ed.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. 235– 250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosworth, H. B., Blalock, D. V., Hoyle, R. H., Czajkowski, S. M., & Voils, C. I.
Affiliations
  • Durham VA Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2018-11
Volume
73
Issue
8
Pages
968-980
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2900138388
Cited by
35
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (CIN 13-410)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (RCS 08-027; RCS 14-443)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30 DA023026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, cardiovascular disease, non-compliance, self-regulation, behavioral interventions, multicomponent intervention
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Behavior Therapy, Behavioral Medicine, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review