Cited by 103Identity, Memory, and TherapyMemory Processes and InfluencesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Autobiographical memory impairments as a transdiagnostic feature of mental illness: A meta-analytic review of investigations into autobiographical memory specificity and overgenerality among people with psychiatric diagnoses.

Open access
Barry, Tom J., Hallford, David J., Takano, Keisuke·2021·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

= 712, 95% CI [0.524, 0.900], memories than diagnoses-free people. The size of these effects did not differ between diagnostic groups. There were no consistent moderators of effect size heterogeneity; effect sizes were not explained by methodological factors such as cue valence or demographic variables such as participants' age or between-group differences in process variables (e.g., rumination). Deficits in autobiographical memory retrieval may be a transdiagnostic factor, but further research in underrepresented diagnostic groups, and with novel experimental manipulations of encoding and retrieval processes, is warranted before full transdiagnosticity and the processes underlying reduced specificity/overgenerality can be established. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000345

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with psychiatric diagnoses remember fewer specific and more general memories compared to individuals without a psychiatric diagnosis (overgeneral memory).

    “On the other hand, it has been observed that individuals with psychiatric diagnoses remember fewer specific and more general memories compared to individuals without a psychiatric diagnosis (overgeneral memory; for a meta-analysis, see Barry et al., 2021).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Barry et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barry, T. J., Hallford, D. J., & Takano, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Barry, Tom J.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2021-10
Volume
147
Issue
10
Pages
1054-1074
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W4200560827
Cited by
103
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
15.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Science Framework
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
autobiographical memory, transdiagnostic factors, memory specificity, memory retrieval deficits, mental illness, rumination
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Mental Recall, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review