Cited by 29Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cultural sexism moderates efficacy of psychotherapy: Results from a spatial meta-analysis.

Price, Maggi A., McKetta, Sarah, Weisz, John R., Ford, Jessie V., Lattanner, Micah R., Skov, Hilary, Wolock, Elizabeth, Hatzenbuehler, Mark L.·2021·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

We examined whether cultural sexism (county- and state-level gender attitudes) moderates the efficacy of psychotherapies by re-analyzing data from a previous meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of youth psychotherapy for the most commonly targeted problems (depression, anxiety, conduct, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; 2,698 effect sizes (ESs); 314 studies; N=19,739; ages 4-18). Higher cultural sexism was associated with lower ESs for studies with greater than or equal to 50% girls; this association became stronger as the proportion of girls in the samples increased. Cultural sexism was unrelated to ESs for studies with greater than 50% boys. An interaction between state- and county-level sexism revealed that psychotherapies were most beneficial when they were conducted in states and counties with the lowest cultural sexism. Thus, the context in which psychotherapies are delivered is associated with psychotherapy efficacy for girls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cps0000031

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, M. A., McKetta, S., Weisz, J. R., Ford, J. V., Lattanner, M. R., Skov, H., Wolock, E., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2021-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
299-312
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W3106943843
Cited by
29
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychotherapy efficacy, gender attitudes, adolescent psychotherapy, depression, anxiety, conduct problems, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review