Cited by 59LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

Guided LGBTQ-affirmative internet cognitive-behavioral therapy for sexual minority youth's mental health: A randomized controlled trial of a minority stress treatment approach

Open access
Pachankis, John E., Soulliard, Zachary A., Layland, Eric K., Behari, Kriti, Seager van Dyk, Ilana, Eisenstadt, Benjamin E., Chiaramonte, Danielle, Ljótsson, Brjánn +2 more·2023·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Objective LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) addresses the adverse impacts of minority stress. However, this treatment has rarely been tested in randomized controlled trials with LGBTQ youth and never using an asynchronous online platform for broad reach. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and multi-level stigma moderators of LGBTQ-affirmative internet-based CBT (ICBT). Method Participants were 120 LGBTQ youth (ages 16-25; 37.5% transgender or non-binary; 75.8% assigned female at birth; 49.2% non-Latino White) living across 38 U.S. states and reporting depression and/or anxiety symptoms. Participants were randomized to receive 10 sessions of LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT or only complete 10 weekly assessments of mental and behavioral health and minority stress; all completed measures of psychological distress, depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, alcohol use, and HIV-transmission-risk behavior at baseline and 4 and 8 months post-baseline; 20 LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT participants completed a qualitative interview regarding intervention acceptability. Results Participants randomized to LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT completed, on average, 6.08 (SD = 3.80) sessions. Participants reported that LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT was helpful and engaging and provided suggestions for enhancing engagement. Although most outcomes decreased over time, between-group comparisons were small and non-significant. LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT was more efficacious in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104403

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent US randomized controlled trial with sexual minority young adults found small, non-significant effects for LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT compared with assessment-only control, but larger and statistically significant comparative effects for participants in US locales with high normative anti-LGBTQ bias.

    “In further support of this possibility, although a recent randomized controlled trial with sexual minority young adults across the US found small, non-significant effects for LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT compared to an assessment-only control, LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT’s comparative effects were larger and statistically significant for participants living in US locales with high degrees of normative anti-L”
  • When interventions are adapted to address the distinct needs of the stigmatized, emerging evidence suggests they are more efficacious under high structural stigma than under low structural stigma.

    “however, when interventions are adapted to address the distinct needs of the stigmatized, some emerging evidence suggests an opposite effect – under conditions of high structural stigma, these adapted interventions are actually more efficacious than under conditions of low structural stigma (Pachankis et al., 2023).”
  • The rate of engagement in the ICBT condition was slightly higher than a similar US trial but lower than other studies of ICBT.

    “This rate of engagement was slightly higher than a similar trial in the US (Pachankis et al., 2023), but lower than other studies of ICBT (Andrews et al., 2018).”
  • The present effect sizes for depression, anxiety, and alcohol use problems were much larger than those in the most similar previous US trial of LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT, which found no significantly greater improvement for these outcomes compared to assessment-only.

    “However, the present effect sizes were much larger than those found in the most similar previous study of LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT delivered in the US using the same delivery platform, research design, and control condition. In that study, LGBTQ-affirmative ICBT yielded no significantly greater improvement in depression or anxiety symptoms or alcohol use problems compared to the assessment-only”
  • Treatment engagement did not significantly moderate the primary outcome of HIV-transmission-risk behavior, nor depression and anxiety, which was inconsistent with a similar US study.

    “Treatment engagement did not yield significant moderating effects in the primary outcome of HIV-transmission-risk behavior, nor in depression and anxiety, which was inconsistent with a similar study in the U.S. (Pachankis et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pachankis, J. E., Soulliard, Z. A., Layland, E. K., Behari, K., Seager van Dyk, I., Eisenstadt, B. E., Chiaramonte, D., Ljótsson, B., Särnholm, J., & Bjureberg, J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
Corresponding author
Pachankis, John E.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
169
Pages
104403
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386570692
Cited by
59
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 1
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020031, R01MH109413)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, sexual minority youth, minority stress, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, alcohol consumption, HIV transmission risk behavior, stigma, treatment acceptability, feasibility, psychological distress
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review