The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Daily autonomy supporting or thwarting and students’ motivation and engagement in the high school science classroom.
Abstract
This diary study provided the first classroom-based empirical test of the relations between student perceptions of high school science teachers’ various autonomy supporting and thwarting practices and students’ motivation and engagement on a daily basis over the course of an instructional unit. Perceived autonomy supporting practices were hypothesized to predict autonomous motivation and engagement outcomes, while perceived autonomy thwarting practices were hypothesized to predict controlled motivation and disaffection outcomes. In line with this prediction, multilevel modeling results based on regular reports of 208 high school students in 41 science classes across 6 weeks suggested that 4 perceived daily supports (choice provision, consideration for student preferences and interests, rationales for importance, and question opportunities) and 1 daily thwart (use of uninteresting activities) predicted changes in daily autonomous motivation and engagement. In contrast, changes in students’ daily controlled motivation and disaffection were predicted primarily by 3 perceived daily thwarts (controlling messages, suppression of student perspectives, and use of uninteresting activities). Results also suggested that practices interacted such that the perception of thwarts generally bolstered desirable daily relationships between perceived supports and students’ motivation and the perception of supports generally mitigated undesirable daily relationships between thwarts and motivation. Supplemental exploratory results suggested that the effects of choice and suppression of student perspectives may be heterogeneous and depend on the outcome and/or the presence of other practices. Implications of the findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, what a PE teacher says and does to support students' autonomy (Haerens et al. 2013) may not be identical to what science teachers do (Patall et al. 2018).”
From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Patall et al. 2018
In the citing paper
“Day-to-day variations in perceived parental (Van der Kaap-Deeder et al. 2017) and teacher (Patall et al. 2018) need support have similary been related to daily fluctuations in children's wellbeing and engagement.”
From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Patall et al. 2018
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
(1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,136
(2011) · Cited by 5,290
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,214
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571 · Cited by 3,428 · cited 3×
“…in science class was assessed with 20 items we adapted for our use in a daily diary design from the Engagement versus Disaffection with Learning Student Report (Furrer & Skinner, 2003; Skinner & Belmont, 1993; Skinner et al., 2009) and the Metacognitive Strategies Questionnaire (Wolters, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodPerceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 · Cited by 3,311
Introducing Multilevel Modeling
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781849209366 · Cited by 2,997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1 · Cited by 1,891
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657 · Cited by 766
Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000293 · Cited by 614
Ahmadi, A., Noetel, M., Parker, P. D., Ryan, R. M., Ntoumanis, N., Reeve, J., Beauchamp, M. R., Dicke, T., Yeung, A. S., Ahmadi, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000783 · Cited by 603
Self-citationCheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Trimble, S. S., Pituch, K. A., & Freeman, J. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-288
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2622700099
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 19.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- William T. Grant Foundation (180042)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- autonomy support, student motivation, student engagement, high school science education, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, disaffection, teacher practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
